Bob == Bob Puff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bob Personally, I'd much rather see the HT/Dig patch implemented
Bob before this one. That is IMHO more useful to the average
Bob mailman admin than this.
Jeff's patch is so simple you could prove its correctness
mathematically. The
Brad == Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brad At 5:37 PM +0900 2005-05-03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
It's not a good idea to put the burden of proof on them, when
either the list-owner can be more selective about membership,
or they can use X-No-Archive.
Brad
At 7:17 PM +0900 2005-05-06, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Maybe you could make it part of the user's configuration. Then the
list master could default it to X-No-Archive: yes; individual users
could turn it to no if they want to, including on a message by message
basis. A stretch, I know,
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 7:17 PM +0900 2005-05-06, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Maybe you could make it part of the user's configuration. Then the
list master could default it to X-No-Archive: yes; individual users
could turn it to no if they want to, including on a message by message
