Hi folks,
Jeff Marshall wrote:
I have submitted a patch to SourceForge for consideration.
Feature:
- New third party archiving option that uses The Mail Archive.
I've reading your discussions and kept silent but recently urged to say
something here. You may think this timing is the last
I've looked at the patch, so let me give my general impressions, and
then try to answer some specific questions brought up in this thread.
First, obviously this can't make it into 2.1.6, since that's imminent.
The patch itself looks fine (i.e. no dotted T's or crossed I's :). But
I would
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 06:47, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
I wonder if adding a layer of indirection here would help with these
considerations.
That is -- Mailman could have a box saying archive using external
archivers (without saying which external archivers) that list admins
could
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 11:05, JC Dill wrote:
I personally don't see it as being a significant endorsement. AIUI,
it's a patch that allows 2 software programs to work well together.
Mailman already provides patches or directions to make mailman work well
with qmail and postfix, but I don't
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 04:37, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Hrm. Maybe a way to turn on X-No-Archive should be part of this
patch? (Or does Mailman offer that already? I don't see it.)
Not on the Mailman side.
Good trick, that. Mailman is free software; it will be months before
the revised
what I did with my system was make the archiver completely separate
from Mailman -- to mailman , it's just another email address that the
admin subscribes, or not. Does archiving need to be integrated into
mailman in the first place? As opposed to, say, a place to specifiy
the URL of the
On May 12, 2005, at 5:43 PM, Jeff Marshall wrote:
Barry wrote:
I think I've stated my general philosophy in a previous message.
If WizzyMTA came with a new plug-in, documentation, and some promise
of support help (if only to answer questions on mailman-users), we'd
probably add the module
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 04:45, Fil wrote:
I would see it that way, in the Archiving section of admin :
Archiving on a foreign system :
---
prevent archiving on foreign systems yes [] no [x]
(adds a X-NO-Archive: header)
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 19:48, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
Does archiving need to be integrated into
mailman in the first place? As opposed to, say, a place to specifiy
the URL of the archives for display?
The key is that you have to know what value to insert into List-Archive.
But it dovetails
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 20:43, Jeff Marshall wrote:
I'll get back with MARC and possibly GMane so I can try to make things
as general as is reasonable. I'll try to run a proposed approach in
front of the list before coding it (unless it's easy enough to
demonstrate the proposal via code).
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 04:45, Fil wrote:
I would see it that way, in the Archiving section of admin :
Archiving on a foreign system :
---
prevent archiving on foreign systems yes [] no [x]
(adds a
All of a sudden, within the last hour or so, subject_prefix on both
mailman-users@python.org and mailman-developers@python.org is being
added to replies even though it's already present resulting in
doubling and tripling (so far not more) of the prefix.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 00:23, Mark Sapiro wrote:
All of a sudden, within the last hour or so, subject_prefix on both
mailman-users@python.org and mailman-developers@python.org is being
added to replies even though it's already present resulting in
doubling and tripling (so far not more) of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
