Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Manish Gill
On 05/08/2013 10:39 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Richard Wackerbarth writes: I appears that my communication was not as successful as I had hoped. I don't know about your communication. My point here is that the *student's* communication was insufficient. I'll be more thorough in the

[Mailman-Developers] GSoC Project Discussion - Web Posting Interface.

2013-05-08 Thread Peter Markou
Hello to all the members of the community, I've applied a proposal on Melange for the Web Posting Interface. The major subject of this project, as described in the wiki, is to allow logged in users to post message from the web interface and integrate it into the appropriate pages(e.g the

[Mailman-Developers] GSoC Project Discussion - Web Posting Interface.

2013-05-08 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Peter Markou writes: Now regarding Richard's email, GSoC Applicants. After having a comprehensive examination in Hyperkitty I found that the functionality for posting messages through web exists. I think it should be split out as a separate Django app, independent of HyperKitty.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC Project Discussion - Web Posting Interface.

2013-05-08 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
I agree with Steve. One of the advantages of Django is its mix and match capability. Actually, I see two possible apps. One would integrate with HK. The other would be simpler, just providing a posting mechanism that provides authenticated message sender. On May 8, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Stephen

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC Project Discussion - Web Posting Interface.

2013-05-08 Thread Terri Oda
In practical terms, I think the time would be better spent on integrating HyperKitty and Postorius for Mailman suite *first* and then dividing out the posting capability once the integration is done. That way the person who does this has some idea of the pain points of integration so they can

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Florian Fuchs
2013/5/7 Manish Gill mgil...@outlook.com: Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the project and he has been very helpful in getting me started with the project. Right now, I'm focusing

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On May 8, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Florian Fuchs flo.fu...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/5/7 Manish Gill mgil...@outlook.com: Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the project and he has been very

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On May 8, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Florian Fuchs flo.fu...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/5/7 Manish Gill mgil...@outlook.com: Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the project and he has been very

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoc - Requirement from Mentor to complete the project

2013-05-08 Thread Abhilash Raj
Consider this flow of message from one user to all list-subscribers: * A user sends a message( signed as well as encrypted )which as soon as received by mailman is first queued in IN queue. * When the incoming runner wakes up the message is checked if it is for owners, posting or encrypted.An