On Friday 24 May 2013 12:03 PM, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> I've just typesetted
> http://non-gnu.uvt.nl/pub/mailman/mailman-2.1.15-with-pgp-smime_2012-08-28-patch/pgp-smime/audit.pdf
> and
> http://non-gnu.uvt.nl/pub/mailman/mailman-2.1.15-with-pgp-smime_2012-08-28-patch/pgp-smime/audit2/audit2.
On Friday 24 May 2013 11:24 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I don't recall for sure but I don't think so. I tend to think it's
> too much effort. We do worry about routing cycles and handle that
> with X-Been-Seen fields. Message-IDs themselves are not very useful;
> in my own experience repea
On Thursday 23 May 2013 11:56 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 12:06 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote:
>
>> For the encrypted lists yes, the key will be marked as
>> 'encryption capable'. The list owner has to upload the
>> public-private keypair for the list.
>>
>>> [dkg wrote:] ***SIGNED_PO
