Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python 3

2015-01-06 Thread Florian Fuchs
Am 06.01.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Barry Warsaw: On Jan 06, 2015, at 01:37 PM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: I must also consider how much work it would be to just port HyperKitty KittyStore to Python3. All things considered, it may very well be faster and more reliable. Of course, I encourage

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python 3

2015-01-06 Thread Aurelien Bompard
I must also consider how much work it would be to just port HyperKitty KittyStore to Python3. All things considered, it may very well be faster and more reliable. A. ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python 3

2015-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 06, 2015, at 01:37 PM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: I must also consider how much work it would be to just port HyperKitty KittyStore to Python3. All things considered, it may very well be faster and more reliable. Of course, I encourage any porting to Python 3 just on principle :) and

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python 3

2015-01-06 Thread Aurelien Bompard
What if a site wanted to run them on different VMs for example? Yeah, but certainly there should be a limit to that. What if a site wanted to run each mailman runner on a different VM for example? Oh well, I guess there's no other way. I hope it's not going to be a mess to configure, I'd like

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python 3

2015-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 06, 2015, at 02:55 PM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: What if a site wanted to run them on different VMs for example? Yeah, but certainly there should be a limit to that. What if a site wanted to run each mailman runner on a different VM for example? There's already some support for that, in

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Some raw thinking on user level authorization and authentication

2015-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
Hi Andrew, thanks for starting to look at this. On Dec 17, 2014, at 09:29 AM, Andrew Stuart wrote: step 1: authentication —- HTTP client provides username and password —- username and password sent to Mailman REST server —- if Mailman REST server authenticates username and password: —-

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

2015-01-06 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Tanstaafl writes: On 12/30/2014 2:39 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote: * A release, which remains on Python 2.7 * B release, which is only compatible with Python 3.4 So, wheezy admins will be left out in the cold. There may be free software, but There Ain't No Such Thing As A

Re: [Mailman-Developers] X-Message-ID-Hash header (was Re: Python 3)

2015-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 04, 2015, at 03:10 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: So the homebrew hash was dumb idea, and will gracefully retire in favor of the standard mailman hash algorithm. It was pretty neat to see some usage, though. And Archived-At still looks like a winner. Definitely. X-Message-ID-Hash was just a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] MM3 REST API testing [was: Python 3]

2015-01-06 Thread Florian Fuchs
Am 06.01.2015 um 04:24 schrieb Barry Warsaw: On Jan 01, 2015, at 11:40 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: I'm playing with a solution that involves the use of the 'vcr' package So this branch is now ready for review. https://code.launchpad.net/~barry/mailman.client/bilingual/+merge/245537 I

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

2015-01-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: So, wheezy admins will be left out in the cold. I expect Debian jessie will become Debian stable soon enough. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

2015-01-06 Thread Tanstaafl
On 1/6/2015 8:36 PM, Paul Wise pa...@bonedaddy.net wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: So, wheezy admins will be left out in the cold. I expect Debian jessie will become Debian stable soon enough. Not for those wanting to avoid systemd.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

2015-01-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: Not for those wanting to avoid systemd. systemd is optional and easy to avoid in Debian. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

2015-01-06 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/30/2014 2:39 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote: * A release, which remains on Python 2.7 * B release, which is only compatible with Python 3.4 So, wheezy admins will be left out in the cold. Bummer... :( ___ Mailman-Developers mailing

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Introduction and GSoC project requests

2015-01-06 Thread Konstantinos N
Hello again Mailman developers. I have received some more guidance so i wanted to correct some mistakes in my previous email. On 01/05/2015 08:09 PM, Konstantinos N wrote: On to the requests now. I saw two project ideas for GSoC 2014 that really interested me and i would like some guidance

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

2015-01-06 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 01/06/2015 09:48 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 12/30/2014 2:39 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote: * A release, which remains on Python 2.7 * B release, which is only compatible with Python 3.4 So, wheezy admins will be left out in the cold. Bummer... :( See the last paragraph of