tate. More generally, having a bunch of
lists/users/etc would be helpful in developing the UI further.
(for what its worth, I did search the mailman devs archive and look through
the docs before asking this)
Thanks,
~ethan fremen
___
Mailman-Developers ma
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 02, 2012, at 02:23 PM, Ethan Fremen wrote:
>
> >I don't have rights to edit/comment on the 5-minute-guide page
>
I want to improve the wiki docs. Can I -
http://wiki.list.org/display/~mindlace - have per
x27;t have rights to edit/comment on the 5-minute-guide page, and I am
not sure how I should deal with commit changes I make...
Thanks,
~ethan fremen
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012, Terri Oda wrote:
> Yeay! In addition to what Barry said (join Postorious!) I just want to
> say I'm really excited to see you back. :)
Thanks, Terri! I hope I'll be more useful this time around.
More specifically, though, I think a good first step with Postorious
+Interface+Status page says that a
basic UI is being set up.
Is there a way I can jump in and help?
Thanks,
~ethan fremen
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman
make progress on
this that I will happily start with anything that y'all think is "low
hanging fruit" just so I can get something committed that can actually
be used.
Thanks,
~ethan fremen
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Develo
Ethan Fremen wrote:
> For pages that are "generated" rather than hand-edited, I propose we use
> this doctype as of 2.2:
>
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
And with 3.0 I would like to see the following:
* All pages serve
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> I have an idea for a proposed conservative approach for 2.1:
>
> * Add two mm_cfg settings: CSS_FILES and JS_FILES, while are lists
> (alternatively, whitespace-separated strings):
>
> CSS_FILES = ['/css/mailman.css', '/css/custom.css']
> JS_FILES = ['/js/swi
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:24:27AM -0400, Terri Oda wrote:
>> Have the CSS generated by a CGI (which could then use these variables
>> if they're available).
>> - extra processing for each web request
>> + could lay groundwork to make it possible to change settings on a
>
Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> Genshi has been mentioned a few times. My impression was that it
>> insists
>> on producing valid XML output, which is nice, but doesn't necessarily
>> play well with ideas like factorisable head/foot portions.
It doesn't; it has an HTML output mode. Yes, you should have
Barry Warsaw wrote:
\
> Related to the different levels of customizability, I'd say that it
> should be easy for folks to change some color schemes and basic look
> with just a passing understanding of CSS.
I agree with this, and think that a vast swath of customization needs
could be met wit
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> Patch #1415956 from Bryan Carbonnell adds CSS for styling purposes and
> changes the HTML to be valid XHTML1.0. It still needs some tidying
> up, and it still uses tables for layout, but that patch takes us
> halfway there.
For the moment, I can make at least IE7/firefox "i
Hi! I'm a spoiled young brat who used to have ambitions to be a graphic
designer, did a couple of underground 'zines right around when this
whole "web" thing started.
Anyway, so I got dragged kicking and screaming into the programming side
of things- astute googling would find some posts of me
I think it is an excellent idea to move to a distributed source code
system, and my time in the trenches with Barry doing python.org mail
stuff makes me think that the easier it is for the lead developers to
work directly with the support people, the better it is for the software
project.
I've
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On May 2, 2007, at 10:21 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:47:40AM -0400, Ethan Fremen wrote:
>>> Right now, I think the "low hanging fruit" is to rip out all
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Of course, I think it /will/ make our lives harder in some ways. As
> we've seen, folks like cPanel have their own forks that they modify,
> and then their users come looking to us for support, which we can't
> give them. Having more public branches out there will inc
Let's see if python.org is ok with me now...
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> If there are folks who want to start working on a new web u/i, either
> to integrate a new templating system, or to prototype better content
> or usability, then in the short term the thing to do would be to
> branch Mailman
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> If there are folks who want to start working on a new web u/i, either
> to integrate a new templating system, or to prototype better content
> or usability, then in the short term the thing to do would be to
> branch Mailman 2.1 and let you have at it. In order to get
18 matches
Mail list logo