I got a request for adding the membership count of a list as a header of
each message posted, in order to remind posters how many people's time they
are potentially wasting :)
https://mailmanhost/mailman/admin/misc-mv/?VARHELP=nondigest/msg_header
doesn't seem to show such a variable
Is there on
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:31:48PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 12:27, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I just wanted to report that one of my mailman servers was also hit
by this bug.
All mails to the list were stopped until I applied the patch (i.e. the
shunted messages weren't
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 12:02:26AM -0700, Mike Burton wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a patch to strip an attachment from list
mail, save it to disk (in the web directory), and insert a URL to the file
in it's place with Mailman 2.x? If not, some clues on where this might
fit in would be
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:00:25PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
together. The apparent result of this batching is that the total
delivery time [3] for a moderation batch is now reduced by a factor of
almost 5. [3]
Not a bad side effect for a little idle poking about.
Indeed, it will increase
So, unless I'm missing something, if you use VERP, you should be able to
process any bounce from a subscriber.
Is it desirable for mailman to pass on a VERP bounce coming from a held
message notification sent to a non subscriber?
Would it make sense for mailman if it receives a bounce
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:03:38PM +0100, Matthias Juchem wrote:
There is a patch manager on sf.net, but apparently without possibily to add a
patch, at least for people who are not registered for the project.
Mmmh, anyone with an account on sf.net can submit patches.
I'm not a registered
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:06:38PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
3) I can't prove this, but... Since I went to To/From header
personalization, I've started getting complaints about mail not
getting to AOL users.
Yeah, this is not terribly surprising. I suspect you're running afoul
of
Is/was there a bug with expanding strings for foreign languages?
(my mailman is probably cvs as of 5-6 weeks ago)
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: notification d'abonnement de Powerteam_fr
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-List-Administrivia: yes
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:56:47PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Speeaking of Mailman's README.EXIM, do we want to continue to
distribute a copy of the exim.org doc, or should we zap that and just
include a pointer to the canonical location on the web? Which, I'm
assuming, will be
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:18:28PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MM That'd be nice, but I think Nigel is a bit too busy, I sent
MM him my new version too, but he never had the time to post it
MM on exim.org
Ok. Can you and Greg
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:47:10PM -0400, Greg Ward wrote:
On 11 October 2002, Marc MERLIN said:
I've been meaning to add this:
Hmmm, good point. Hadn't thought about it because SMTP callbacks seem a
little *too* powerful to me.
I think it's more important to add something about
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:44:33PM -0400, Greg Ward wrote:
Hi all --
I've just spent the last couple of hours beating the README.EXIM
document from Mailman's current CVS tree into shape. (This is derived
from Nigel Metheringham's HOWTO - Using exim and Mailman together
document, which can
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Simone Piunno wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:19:21PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
(yeah, I know that reply-to munging is considered harmful but I consider
more important to keep discussions inside the lists and anyway this has
I'm just
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 09:42:08PM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
Now that I think of it, it wouldn't be too hard for mailman when it sends
the list copy out to (optionally) remove from Cc all the Emails from members
that have the nodupes option set.
That way, the Cc would be left
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:08:14PM +0200, Simone Piunno wrote:
Hi,
I run a bunch of lists with reply_goes_to_list=1
(yeah, I know that reply-to munging is considered harmful but I consider
more important to keep discussions inside the lists and anyway this has
I'm just amazed at how
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:19:21PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:08:14PM +0200, Simone Piunno wrote:
Hi,
I run a bunch of lists with reply_goes_to_list=1
(yeah, I know that reply-to munging is considered harmful but I consider
more important to keep
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:33:19PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
SF Emails sent in a single day from Mailing lists: 851,143 (Monday)
^^^
Actually, I remember that we hit a million a few times :-)
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:12:40AM -0400, Ron Jarrell wrote:
It's not wrong everywhere - the actual bounce from their mailer daemon
mentions the correct verp address for your list, for instance.
Mmmh, looking at it further, it looks like you're right.
But look at the way it broke it up:
I have someone who subscribed with a .info address to one of my lists, and I
have VERP enabled.
Apparently, mailman chokes on that (see the verp address, it's incorrect: it
doesn't contain the list name). Does mailman use an out of date list of TLDs
anywhere?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL
So I get this every day, but the page tells me there are no pending
requests.
Any ideas?
moremagic:/var/local/mailman/lists/sa-exim# l
total 28
drwxrwsr-x2 root mailman 4096 Jun 12 00:05 ./
drwxrwsr-x 22 root mailman 4096 May 7 21:44 ../
-rw-rw1 www-data mailman
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:36:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Can I suppress the Results of your email commands email for this
list or alternatively for the whole site?
- Is there a way to suppress most parts of the web-interface for a
list.
Yes to both, but not without hacking the
]?subject=subscribe
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: GNU Mailman developers mailman-developers.python.org
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:54:42PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
If this works as expected, all the headers below the subject line
message-Ids in reference lines
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 05:33:57PM -0400, Ron Jarrell wrote:
At 12:16 AM 6/2/02 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Ahah, and now it barfs on python.org too.
I don't get this bug, I really don't...
Yea. It's not simple line length. It also appears to really need
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 05:06:17PM -0500, David Gibbs wrote:
Folks:
How does one go about contributing code?
I've made some small changes in my cvs sandbox that I think would be useful
for the core code. Do I mail them to someone (Barry?) for consideration,
post them here, what?
If the
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 06:47:34PM -0500, David Gibbs wrote:
At 06:29 PM 6/2/2002, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Better yet, post it on the SF patch manager, so it doesn't get lost in
my inbox! ;)
Ok. What's the prescribed method of preparing a good diff?
cvs diff?
cvs diff -u :-)
Marc
--
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 06:58:44PM -0500, David Gibbs wrote:
At 06:54 PM 6/2/2002, Marc MERLIN wrote:
cvs diff -u :-)
Mmmh, no, that'd make your patch inversed.
You sure? I just ran a diff on my patch and it looks right to me...
Never mind, you're right. Too much hacking, not enough
I just synced my tree, and:
make[1]: Entering directory `/var/local/src/mailman-cvs/misc'
for p in email-2.0.4 JapaneseCodecs-1.4.5 KoreanCodecs-2.0.4; \
do \
gunzip -c $p.tar.gz | tar xf -; \
(cd $p ; PYTHONPATH=/var/local/mailman/pythonlib /usr/bin/python setup.py --quiet
install
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:04:46PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
DG File /usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/_compat22.py, line
DG 21 yield self ^
| SyntaxError: invalid syntax
| ^C [ I killed it at this point ]
| interrupted
| make[1]: *** [install-packages] Error
I updated to CVS a few days ago and I'm now getting this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /var/local/mailman/bin/config_list, line 270, in ?
main()
File /var/local/mailman/bin/config_list, line 262, in main
do_output(listname, outfile)
File /var/local/mailman/bin/config_list, line
This bounce didn't get handled by mailman even though it went
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see Received lines),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to the list, and I'm pretty sure VERP
bounce processing is working otherwise.
Any ideas?
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:02:30PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
This bounce didn't get handled by mailman even though it went
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see Received lines),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to the list, and I'm pretty sure VERP
bounce processing is working
: Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: testing reference field
References:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]004001c1fe06$3f5be350$a3c5e80c@MoeA
011c01c1fe07$6d8edd30$647ba8c0@C1912731A
test 2
- End forwarded message -
The HTML approve window shows this:
Message Headers
2) The new nodupes setting is really something you probably want as a
default on all lists. I also had lists were people wanted notmetoo as a
default too.
Ben's fix for that is to have a bitfield per list that you can set and
that states which options newly added users
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:40:42PM -0500, Bill Bradford wrote:
One thing Ive had to do when moving lists between machines (both running
2.0.9/10), is newlist the lists on the destination machine, then overwrite
the $prefix/lists/$listname directories/files and $prefix/archives/private/
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:16:13PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I would kill for a post-filter. Why? So I can inject every message
with the URL of where it sits in the web archives.
Yeah, liststar does that, and it's *quite* nice.
Never mind, I misread.
What I meant to say is that it'd
I have a user who says he got this on mailman 2.1b1cvs
He explains below how he did it.
- Forwarded message from David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Mailman results for Empeg-faq
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-List-Administrivia: yes
This is an automated response.
[moved to mailman-developers]
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:52:30PM -0700, Ellen Spertus wrote:
I could use some advice here. I took a snapshot because I'm making a lot
of my own changes to the code, i.e., adding dynamic sublists. My
Yeah, I know about that problem :-)
short-term goal is to
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:04:03PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM I'll probably also contribute a small script that watches the
MM number of messages in the mailman queue, and sends a warning
MM if there are more than X (meaning that you have some serious
MM backlog, or some
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:02:30PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
I've updated the FAQ entry with some useful information for MM2.1.
Cool, thanks.
BTW, I *very* seldom edit messages that are held for moderation. I think
twice it was because I forgot to change my posting address from my
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:44:16AM -0700, John W Baxter wrote:
Nor is it what I see running Mailman with Exim. But I haven't ventured
into 2.1b1 yet.
How does Mailman deliver the messages to Exim?
Err, over port 25. I'm not sure I understand the question you probably meant
to ask though :)
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:33:59PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
SMTP 451 Temporary local problem - please try later
MM The problem is that mailman decided that the whole post
MM failed, and started to resend it in a loop.
If I'm reading RFC 2821 correctly, this is the right
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:30:53PM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:58:28PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Either mailman or majordomo, hard to say.
Majordomo had a big installed base, but it's losing grounds quickly
(it was far from being the best, but it was the most
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:55:01AM -0400, Tom Neff wrote:
Billie R. McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to
edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one
inappropriate word).
How can we do this?
I just upgraded one of my servers to exim 4 and mailman choked badly on having
exim refuse a message because exim did this:
DNS lookup of scruznet.com (MX) gave TRY_AGAIN
scruznet.com in dns_again_means_nonexist? no (option unset)
returning DNS_AGAIN
lookuphost router: defer for [EMAIL
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:36:27PM -0700, Ellen Spertus wrote:
Any ballpark estimates on the number of Mailman subscribers
globally? Given that the FAQ mentions a list with 147,000 users, it seems
safe to say that there are millions of Mailman users. What do you think?
Yes, there are
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:47:31PM -0700, Ellen Spertus wrote:
Do we know what the most popular open-source mlm is? My guess would be
Mailman, but that's just off the top of my head.
Either mailman or majordomo, hard to say.
Majordomo had a big installed base, but it's losing grounds
I have web_page_url set to the wrong value for a list I just created.
Outside of using config_list, is there any easier way to change the domain
the list is in?
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
what McDonalds is to
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:38:00AM -0700, Dan Mick wrote:
I have web_page_url set to the wrong value for a list I just created.
Outside of using config_list, is there any easier way to change the domain
the list is in?
I believe config_list won't do it. withlist.
Indeed,
This happened twice on sf.net about 12H after the upgrade to 2.0.9
Apr 09 02:28:06 2002 usw-sf-list1 qrunner(9416): Traceback (most recent call las
t):
Apr 09 02:28:06 2002 usw-sf-list1 qrunner(9416): File /var/local/mailman/cron
/qrunner, line 282, in ?
Apr 09 02:28:06 2002 usw-sf-list1
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:44:48PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Arrgghh! Can you say MM2.0.10? :(
Sorry.
See attached patch.
Applied, thanks.
It should be. The first one is because somebody's got something bogus
in their message header, the second because they've enabled
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:03:48PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
See attached patch.
MM Applied, thanks.
Can you keep an eye on the log files for a few days? I'm going to
apply the same patch on python.org and watch it there too. If all
looks good for a few days I'll release
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:17:50PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
I'm in a mad quest to reduce the number of open Mailman bugs to under
50 so it fits on one page. I'm nearly there.
I'll get someone to increase the page length to 100 bugs.
No, don't thank me, I'm just glad I could help :-)))
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:26:09PM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
It's fairly old blush but it's complaining that there is no way to
tell the difference between a list posting and an administrative
message via the List-* headers.
What's an administrative message?
message foo needs moderation
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:41:35PM -0500, Ron Jarrell wrote:
At 12:13 AM 4/5/02 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
E.g. we could shut off email confirms altogether and force only web
confirmations. Or we could be more Majordomo-ish as JC describes.
I think all potential subscribers to *any*
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:39:06PM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
I've just identified a pretty bad bug in mailman 2.0.x qrunner. It can cause
messages to get lost, so, I almost hate to say this, Barry, but it might be
time for a quick 2.0.9 patch. Given the changes to queuing in 2.1, I
I had to modify the string Moderate.py to give a more appropriate reject
message.
Ideally this should be a string per list.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: test 3
From: x
To: y
You are not allowed to post to this mailing list without being
subscribed, and your
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:32:27AM -0500, Ron Jarrell wrote:
Am I being too biased towards Postfix to the detriment of other MTAs?
Well, I do get the impression that Postfix is the Official MTA of Mailman,
although you're welcome to use one of those *sniff* Other MTA's...
Funny, I thought
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:20:19PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
RJ == Ron Jarrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RJ Ah, I see what's going on.. configure changed between 2.0.5
RJ and 2.1; in 2.0.5 it just checks other mail demon for
RJ possible groups - and at the time I reviewed
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:14:23PM -0500, Ron Jarrell wrote:
/home/mailman/bin/unshunt *
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/mailman/bin/unshunt, line 76, in ?
main()
File /home/mailman/bin/unshunt, line 64, in main
usage(1)
File /home/mailman/bin/unshunt, line
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:04:12PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
The mail stops here, there is no body whatsoever.
Ok, after clearing my CVS tree, re-installing mailman from a freshly built
CVS tree, and restarting the qrunners, I still get this: I just got digest
#3, and again, the body
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:12:54PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
RFC 2822 explicitly states that Reply-To can contain a list of
headers. RFC 822 is more ambiguous. To my mind this single fact (if
used with Reply-To aggregation) obviates most of the arguments in the
Reply-To Munging Considered
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 07:19:45PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
mailman-cvs gives me:
Mar 16 19:18:23 2002 (28557) Uncaught runner exception: (111, 'Connection refused')
(...)
File /usr/lib/python2.1/smtplib.py, line 222, in connect
self.sock.connect((host, port))
error: (111
Just to make sure I got this right:
If I go to (let's say):
http://lists.svlug.org/lists/admin/speakers/privacy/spam
I can set values in acceptable_aliases
In http://lists.svlug.org/lists/admin/speakers/privacy/sender
I can get mailman to auto-reject or discard messages depending on the sender
mailman-cvs gives me:
Mar 16 19:18:23 2002 (28557) Uncaught runner exception: (111, 'Connection refused')
Mar 16 19:18:23 2002 (28557) Traceback (most recent call last):
File /var/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py, line 103, in __oneloop
self.__onefile(msg, msgdata)
File
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 07:14:17PM -0600, Bill Bradford wrote:
Any idea on a feature freeze /release timeline for 2.1?
RSN :-)
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:57:55PM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
Correction: RRRSN. :)
As I remember it, Barry wants to ship 2.1 by February.
Eh, I'm supposed to be the smartass around here :-)
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:18:54AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Per Barry's recommendation, I wrote this by adding a flag for each user and
duping each list message (munged and non munged version) and sending the
right version to each user.
Just in case someone wonders why we went this way
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:56:36AM -0500, Dale Newfield wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Marc MERLIN wrote:
- no dupe patch written by Ben and already in mailman cvs thanks to Barry
Just wanted to note that one big piece of this (which is currently left
out) still causes other problems
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:46:33PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM Basically, I'm saying that if I post to a list without
MM reply-to munging, if I set (as a poster) a reply-to, it
MM doesn't make it to the list. (I just checked on 2 other
MM machines where I have
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:20:05PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MM Mmmh, I'm really not sure why one would want that.
I think the idea is that a list admin might want to force
reply-to-alls to go back to the whole list.
Reply
[I'm Ccing mailman-developers in case a few people there aren't on
mailman-users, but please reply on mailman-users]
Ben Gertzfield wrote a patch which Barry recently included in mailman-cvs
which allows you to not receive the list copy of a message in you were Cced
in the headers
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:01:42PM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
Reply to all will reply to the Reply-To + To + Cc list in the MUAs I looked
at.
Not true for all.
I guess I'm not too surprised. I'm not too sure the behavior in this case is
well defined. I just know that when I Cc
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 08:30:03PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
However, I just realized that when I prepared my updated patch that I fed to
Barry last week, I forgot this:
--- mailman-wp/Mailman/versions.py Fri Aug 17 14:40:28 2001
+++ mailman/Mailman/versions.py Thu Sep 6 12:55:00 2001
On my test list, which doesn't have reply-to munging enabled, if I send a
test post with a reply-to header, it doesn't make it to the list (or to
ToOutgoing for that matter)
Before I look into this deeper, is this just me?
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:49:05AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MM On my test list, which doesn't have reply-to munging enabled,
MM if I send a test post with a reply-to header, it doesn't make
MM it to the list (or to ToOutgoing
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:02:33PM +0900, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
I'm not at all sure why this is, but on a completely fresh install of
CVS mailman, even though DEFAULT_NEW_MEMBER_OPTIONS = 256, all my new
list members are created with the 'moderated' flag on.
Look for this in Defaults.py:
#
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:22:55PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MM root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/bin# ./dumpdb
MM ../lists/test3/config.pck | grep user_options 'user_options':
MM {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 266},
MM root@gandalf
When I went to:
http://gandalf-lists.merlins.org/lists/confirm/test2/372ff4ab4ca390f3c3bfabd47cd78e92489a0b5d
(don't bother trying, it's localhost on my laptop :-D)
I get an HTML page to confirm my subscription.
I haven't looked at the code in details, but does mailman need to put
the list
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 05:16:21PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Okay, I've looked over all the code. Except for some stylistic
issues, which I'll just correct as I go, my biggest concern is the
database used in AvoidDuplicates.py.
Yeah, I looked at that too, but being tired, I didn't get
This version of the patch add --fromall which lets you remove a specified
Email from all your lists
(replaces my _alllists_ special hack)
--- ../../src/mailman-cvs/bin/remove_membersFri Sep 7 16:18:47 2001
+++ remove_members Mon Mar 4 23:02:17 2002
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Remove members
I bring up an admin page,
from the shell, I remove a user
I change the user options in the web form, and click submit
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /var/local/mailman/scripts/driver, line 82, in run_main
main()
File /var/local/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admin.py, line 166, in main
root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/bin# ./dumpdb ../lists/test3/config.pck | grep
user_options
'user_options': {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 266},
root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/bin# ./list_members test3
root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/bin#
On bigger lists, list_members returns some of the list
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:00:54PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM I've changed GUI/GUIBase.py with the hopes to output a better
MM error: try: val = self._getValidValue(mlist, property, wtype,
MM val) except ValueError: doc.addError(_(Invalid value
MM '+val+' for variable:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:56:03PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MM When VERP is enabled, mailman apparently sends all the Emails
MM over one SMTP connection.
Actually, I don't think it has anything to do with VERP. Won't normal
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:27:49PM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/Mailman# grep VERP_ mm_cfg.py
VERP_FORMAT = '%(bounces)s+%(mailbox)s=%(host)s'
VERP_REGEXP = r'^[^+]+?\+(?Pmailbox[^=]+)=(?Phost[^@]+)@.*$'
VERP_PASSWORD_REMINDERS = 1
VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:40:20PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Actually, we're no worse off than we were before, in fact, it should
now be better. How many messages have /you/ gotten from people
receiving the password reminder from a list they never heard of?
The funny thing is that I've
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:03:14PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM The funny thing is that I've gotten lots of hate mail saying
MM how do you dare sending my my mailman password in
MM cleartext. STOP THIS NOW!!!, but not one why did this come
MM from [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
I've modified Nigel's exim transports (hopefully in good).
Please review and tell me if this is fit for a patch to Barry:
(I'll also submit an exim 4 version if those are good)
The director now deals with VERP bounces and with lists that have -command
in their name (like mailman-owner, which
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:48:11PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
DO And the problem is, that update script will try to remove the
DO unused Cookie.py, but it will first import it (indirectly) so
DO the whole update scrtipt fails to execute and has no
DO possibility to delete
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:25:45AM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
'cat' on the .pck isn't extremely useful; how about bin/dumpdb?
Sorry, I thought cat was enough. Dumpdb doesn't seem to show anything else:
root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/bin# ./dumpdb
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:25:14PM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
File /var/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/BounceRunner.py, line 112, in
__verpbounce
if bmailbox mo.group('bounces'):
IndexError: no such group
Are you sure Defaults.py is up-to-date? Specifically,
VERP_FORMAT and
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:24:08PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets disabled, thus shutting off a large list of
recipients.
Or will/should yahoogroups rewrite the envelope sender for /its/
downstream members?
yahoogroups should rewrite the envelope sender to catch
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
So I was debugging this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Child process of mm21_transport transport returned 6 from command:
/var/local/mailman/mail/mailman
and found out that the mailman wrapper returns 6 with no error
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:00:05AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
I've added a new configuration variable to Defaults.py.in, called
ALLOW_SITE_ADMIN_COOKIES. Set this to true and authenticating to a
list admin login page with the site password, and Mailman will drop a
cookie representing the
I have mm 2.1a4cvs setup to refuse posts from non members and forward a copy
to the list owner.
This only happens if generic_nonmember_action is set to reject
(accept, hold, and discard work)
Feb 21 00:51:39 2002 (55) Uncaught runner exception: get_type
Feb 21 00:51:39 2002 (55) Traceback (most
I now tried to set non member posts to auto-discard.
If I do not set forward_auto_discards, it works as intended.
If I set it, it works as if the list were moderated (the poster gets a
notice that the message needs moderation and the list owner gets a notice
that there is something to moderate)
--- ../../src/mailman-cvs/build/contrib/check_perms_grsecurity.py Wed Feb 20
23:37:35 2002
+++ check_perms_grsecurity.py Wed Feb 20 23:42:57 2002
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
os.chmod(file, 06755)
print \nMaking mail wrapper setuid mailman
-file= paths.prefix + '/mail/wrapper'
Apparently, when I upgraded a list that had posting for members only, this
setting didn't get translated into the new
generic_nonmember_action / Hold
I believe it defaulted to Accept.
For migrating sites with many lists, having that convertion done
automatically would be good.
URLs were missing the trailing slash, which caused an extra http request
and an http redirect.
diff -urN mailman-cvs.orig/Mailman/Archiver/Archiver.py
mailman-cvs/Mailman/Archiver/Archiver.py
--- mailman-cvs.orig/Mailman/Archiver/Archiver.py Mon Feb 11 15:14:16 2002
+++
First, I got:
Compiling /var/local/mailman/Mailman/versions.py ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/update, line 47, in ?
from Mailman import MailList
File /var/local/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py, line 49, in ?
from Mailman.Archiver import Archiver
File
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
