On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:34:04PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > want to bundle Pipermail. But I'm happy to make it more obvious, or
> > easier, or whatever, to point people at MHonArc. I'm leery of including
>
> A simple step toward this
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:34:04PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> want to bundle Pipermail. But I'm happy to make it more obvious, or
> easier, or whatever, to point people at MHonArc. I'm leery of including
A simple step toward this for Mailman 2.2 would be to change the URL layout
for the archiv
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 13:22, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> Dump pipermail completely and include (or point to) MHonARC, it does a great
> job and is easily integrated (UTF-8 support and all).
In the tradition of Python's "batteries included" philosophy, I still
want to bundle Pipermail. But I'm happy t
--- Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 12:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> > The mailman-builtin archiving engine (pipermail) is really not that
> > great
>
> It's better than nothing, but no one has ever made great claims about
> it. Unfortunately, no one has step
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 12:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
> The mailman-builtin archiving engine (pipermail) is really not that
> great
It's better than nothing, but no one has ever made great claims about
it. Unfortunately, no one has stepped up to improve it either although
there have been sever
> "Roger" == Roger Bivand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:26:58 +0200 (CEST) writes:
.
Roger> The second thing, ...: my answer on r-help to a pixmap question
Roger> was:
Roger> ...
Roger> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:20]
Roger> ...
Roger> which in
