Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1 traceback.

2003-02-23 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "CVR" == Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> header, the response can't be usefully VERPified. This should >> be fixed in 2.1.1 by discarding the outgoing message and >> logging an entry to logs/smtp. CVR> ah, okay. Except in this case, I believe the address wa

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1 traceback.

2003-02-20 Thread Chuq Von Rospach
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 09:36 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: "CVR" == Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: CVR> This is someone that's able to post normally, so it's not a CVR> messed up mailer or anything. Anyone else seeing this? This is caused by a VERP delivery t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1 traceback.

2003-02-20 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "CVR" == Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: CVR> This is someone that's able to post normally, so it's not a CVR> messed up mailer or anything. Anyone else seeing this? This is caused by a VERP delivery to an unqualified address, e.g. if a -request message comes in with a

[Mailman-Developers] 2.1 traceback.

2003-02-20 Thread Chuq Von Rospach
Every so often I get a report of a posting sent to one of my lists that dissappears. I got two yesterday. Thanks to some detective work, I found one -- it got shunted because of a traceback: Feb 19 23:44:31 2003 (24496) Uncaught runner exception: sequence expected, NoneT ype found Feb 19 23:44