Re: [Mailman-Developers] ACL in Mailman - what's you opinion

2011-06-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 27, 2011, at 04:35 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: I do not understand why published over completely trusted channels means only on localhost. When two machines are involved, you have to be able to trust both of them, but they don't have to be the same machine. In addition, you will need

[Mailman-Developers] ACL in Mailman - what's you opinion

2011-05-27 Thread Benedict Stein
Dear List-subscribers, wacky and i discussed a few things about how to implement ACL within the Mailman3 parts. I've wrote a small Blogpost about it in http://benste.blogspot.com/2011/05/mailman-3-restapi-webui-acl.html just in case you want to contribute to Pro/Con list directly go to

Re: [Mailman-Developers] ACL in Mailman - what's you opinion

2011-05-27 Thread Barry Warsaw
Hi benste, On May 27, 2011, at 05:46 PM, Benedict Stein wrote: wacky and i discussed a few things about how to implement ACL within the Mailman3 parts. I've wrote a small Blogpost about it in http://benste.blogspot.com/2011/05/mailman-3-restapi-webui-acl.html just in case you want to contribute

Re: [Mailman-Developers] ACL in Mailman - what's you opinion

2011-05-27 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
Barry, I do not understand why published over completely trusted channels means only on localhost. When two machines are involved, you have to be able to trust both of them, but they don't have to be the same machine. In addition, you will need to open a secure channel. Even over public