Someone has asked me about some adjustments mailman 2 related to what they think
they have to do for GDPR compliance.
One is to add some checkbox stuff to agree at subscription time that
you understand what info you're providing. I expect this could be
spliced in the same way CAPTCHAs are.
Anoth
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, noskcaJ leahciM wrote:
You might need to pay for a consultation this time.
We did.
There is indeed a lawful basis for processing that is archiving in
the public interest. But you simply misunderstand those provisions
if you believe they give any public or private operato
You might need to pay for a consultation this time.
There is indeed a lawful basis for processing that is archiving in
the public interest. But you simply misunderstand those provisions
if you believe they give any public or private operator of every
archived mail list scope to deny the right to
In article <01qj5jk26gxi000...@encompasserve.org> you write:
>| tl;dr
>
>Too long: The regulation and articles are even longer.
>
>Didn't Read: But you replied none-the-less ;-)
Having been talking to some actual lawyers about GDPR compliance, I
find this analysis absurd.
Specifically about the r
noskcaJ leahciM writes:
> It's the law. Some of us have to deal with it; like it or not.
> GDPR merely calls for explicit consent (where appropriate). E.g.
> A picture is worth a thousand words:
None of this is helpful to me; as far as I can tell it's not
responsive to what I wrote or aske
| noskcaJ leahciM writes:
|
| > | tl;dr
| >
| > Too long: The regulation and articles are even longer.
| >
| > Didn't Read: But you replied none-the-less ;-)
|
| I read EVERYTHING. Above is advice to my readers: "I read, so you
| don't have to". ;-)
|
| I feel sorry for anyone who hangs
noskcaJ leahciM writes:
> | tl;dr
>
> Too long: The regulation and articles are even longer.
>
> Didn't Read: But you replied none-the-less ;-)
I read EVERYTHING. Above is advice to my readers: "I read, so you
don't have to". ;-)
I feel sorry for anyone who hangs out in places where "exe
Barry Warsaw wrote:
| noskcaJ leahciM wrote:
| > GDPR is nearing the last 7 months of its 2 year transitional
| > implementation before becoming part of the law in EU countries (inc.,
| > despite Brexit, the UK), affecting 0.5bn citizens together with US
| > enterprises in und
noskcaJ leahciM wrote:
> GDPR is nearing the last 7 months of its 2 year transitional
> implementation before becoming part of the law in EU countries (inc.,
> despite Brexit, the UK), affecting 0.5bn citizens together with US
> enterprises in under Privacy Shield (replacing S
| tl;dr
Too long: The regulation and articles are even longer.
Didn't Read: But you replied none-the-less ;-)
! I don't think this is worth thinking about until we get a
| request from users who actually are threatened with liability for
| their Mailman installations.
There will be installation
tl;dr I don't think this is worth thinking about until we get a
request from users who actually are threatened with liability for
their Mailman installations.
Suggestions from where we can obtain funding to do this stuff?
The harder parts are non-trivial.
noskcaJ leahciM writes:
> 1. The term
GDPR is nearing the last 7 months of its 2 year transitional
implementation before becoming part of the law in EU countries (inc.,
despite Brexit, the UK), affecting 0.5bn citizens together with US
enterprises in under Privacy Shield (replacing Safe Harbour) as well as
enterpr
12 matches
Mail list logo
