Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hmm... More on header mangling...

2002-05-17 Thread Chuq Von Rospach
On 5/17/02 10:29 PM, "Ron Jarrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Why do I seem to always find the truly strange problems?) Because anyone can find the easy ones? -- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chuqui.com/ IMHO: Jargon. Acronym for In My Humble Opinion. Used t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hmm... More on header mangling...

2002-05-17 Thread Ron Jarrell
At 10:50 PM 5/17/02 -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RJ> Mailman did the "mangle the header line prematurely ending the > RJ> headers" trick to it. But for once I can see what the header > RJ> looked like originally! > >Confirm

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hmm... More on header mangling...

2002-05-17 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RJ> Mailman did the "mangle the header line prematurely ending the RJ> headers" trick to it. But for once I can see what the header RJ> looked like originally! Confirmed (and sorry about that hold warning you probably got Ron ;)

[Mailman-Developers] Hmm... More on header mangling...

2002-05-17 Thread Ron Jarrell
In-ter-esting. Got a note that was sent to a yahoogroup, and to one of my mailman lists simultaneously. Mailman did the "mangle the header line prematurely ending the headers" trick to it. But for once I can see what the header looked like originally! In the yahoo group note it came out as: