Hi,
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Arrgh. A couple of my lists share a host with people who would
probably like to have that option = True, but I definitely want False.
Can this be made to be a "site manager permits, list manager enables"
double opt-in option, pretty please?
Please submit an item in S
I think I should commit one of my unpublishd patch on SourceForge CVS.
(snip)
With this patch, site manager can set
SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True
in mm_cfg.py to use attachment filename extension as is specified by
the original attachment. I also want to merge patch id 1027882
> "Tokio" == Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tokio> I think I should commit one of my unpublishd patch on
Tokio> SourceForge CVS.
[...]
Tokio> With this patch, site manager can set
Tokio> SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True in
Tokio> mm_cfg.py to u
Hi all,
Robby Griffin wrote:
I'll come up with a patch if anyone wants it, but seriously, YMMV, a lot.
I think I should commit one of my unpublishd patch on SourceForge CVS.
@@ -356,8 +396,16 @@
# e.g. image/jpg (should be image/jpeg). For now we just store such
# things as application/o
On Friday, Sep 24, 2004, at 19:07 US/Eastern, Brad Knowles wrote:
Leaving it as a ".doc" file when the MIME bodypart type does not
match the claimed extension *is* dangerous.
In mail, yes (and what does Mailman normally do to sanitize extensions
/ MIME types in the messages it redistributes?). B
On Friday, Sep 24, 2004, at 18:27 US/Eastern, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Robby Griffin wrote:
Get real. It changes the extension not because .doc files are
dangerous
but because the sender simply failed to use Mailman's idea of the
proper MIME type for a .doc file. You can of course get Mailman to
leave a
At 6:04 PM -0400 2004-09-24, Robby Griffin wrote:
Because leaving it as a ".doc" file is dangerous.
Get real. It changes the extension not because .doc files are dangerous
but because the sender simply failed to use Mailman's idea of the proper
MIME type for a .doc file.
Leaving it as a ".doc
Robby Griffin wrote:
>
>Get real. It changes the extension not because .doc files are dangerous
>but because the sender simply failed to use Mailman's idea of the
>proper MIME type for a .doc file. You can of course get Mailman to
>leave a .doc file as a .doc file by sending it in with a content
Robby Griffin wrote:
>
>This is pretty lame. I run Mailman in an environment where most of the
>users use Lotus Notes on Macs, and in our case Mailman converted the
>vast majority of their attachments to .bin or .obj because Notes sent
>most things as application/octet-stream. PDF file? .bin. Ex
On Friday, Sep 24, 2004, at 16:43 US/Eastern, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:50 AM -0600 2004-09-24, Kory Wheatley wrote:
I have Scrubber enabled on my Mailman 2.1.5 configuration. It works
fine stripping the attachments, except, why does it change a
Microsoft
Word extension ".doc" to a ".bin"?
On Friday, Sep 24, 2004, at 16:55 US/Eastern, Mark Sapiro wrote:
You might try putting a .htaccess file in archives/private/listname or
in archives/private/listname/attachments with a
AddType application/msword bin
directive in it. Depending on your web server and browser, this may
work, but if i
Kory Wheatley wrote:
>I have Scrubber enabled on my Mailman 2.1.5 configuration. It works
>fine stripping the attachments, except, why does it change a Microsoft
>Word extension ".doc" to a ".bin"? This makes it difficult to open the
>attachment, because you have to either save it to your h
At 10:50 AM -0600 2004-09-24, Kory Wheatley wrote:
I have Scrubber enabled on my Mailman 2.1.5 configuration. It works
fine stripping the attachments, except, why does it change a Microsoft
Word extension ".doc" to a ".bin"?
Because leaving it as a ".doc" file is dangerous.
Any solutions
I have Scrubber enabled on my Mailman 2.1.5 configuration. It works
fine stripping the attachments, except, why does it change a Microsoft
Word extension ".doc" to a ".bin"? This makes it difficult to open the
attachment, because you have to either save it to your hard drive and
associate t
Hi,
Kory Wheatley wrote:
Does Scrubber have the capibility of allowing attachments through that
are a certain size?
No.
I know once you configure Scrubber and put it in
action in Mailman, it will strip every attachment. This will not work
for me, I would like to have Scrubber only strip attac
Does Scrubber have the capibility of allowing attachments through that
are a certain size? I know once you configure Scrubber and put it in
action in Mailman, it will strip every attachment. This will not work
for me, I would like to have Scrubber only strip attachments if there
over a certai
16 matches
Mail list logo
