Re: [Mailman-Developers] pipe-to-prog/maidir/lmtp performance

2006-10-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 1, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > I've commited it as LMTPRunner.py because it should be restarted by > mailmanctl. > >>How much work is your LMTP >> implementation doing when it receives t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] pipe-to-prog/maidir/lmtp performance

2006-10-01 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > When you feel confident about your lmtp implementation, go ahead and > check it in (probably in Mailman/bin/lmtp.py with hooks for mmshell > - -- or I can do the latter). I think at this early date we should > make both LMTP and Maildir delivery possible, then we'

Re: [Mailman-Developers] pipe-to-prog/maidir/lmtp performance

2006-10-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > With the current default method of invoking mailman post program > and pipelineing takes 49 seconds for the last 100th message to > reach the list member (a local user), while maildir and lmtp

Re: [Mailman-Developers] pipe-to-prog/maidir/lmtp performance

2006-09-30 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:36 AM +0900 10/1/06, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >>An smtpd.py based LTMP server could >> provide an interesting proof of concept though. > > I've almost finished writing this primitive LMTP server. I am no longer on the list. Please do not include me in any

[Mailman-Developers] pipe-to-prog/maidir/lmtp performance

2006-09-30 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, > An smtpd.py based LTMP server could > provide an interesting proof of concept though. I've almost finished writing this primitive LMTP server. Here is a result of experiment of posting 100 messages to a list and measuring arriving/leaving times on my la