> "SP" == Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes. Digest messages should never be replied to. Tell the
>> user to burst his digests and reply to the individual messages.
SP> Sorry, let me rephrase: this is what he wants to do!
SP> He wants to reply to individual
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:11:26PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
> > One of my users is complaining because digested messages have no
> > Reply-To: header. He says the behaviour changed from 2.0 to 2.1. Is
> > this change intentional?
>
> Yes. Digest messages should never be replied to. Tell th
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:59:44 +0200
Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my users is complaining because digested messages have no
> Reply-To: header. He says the behaviour changed from 2.0 to 2.1. Is
> this change intentional?
Yes. Digest messages should never be replied to. Tel
Hi,
One of my users is complaining because digested messages have no
Reply-To: header. He says the behaviour changed from 2.0 to 2.1.
Is this change intentional?
More info:
- the list has reply_goes_to_list = 1
- Reply-To: is ok for non-digest members
- running 2.1b3+
--
Adde parvum par
