Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-06-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/01/2013 06:08 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 29 May 2013, at 1:50 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Actually, that patch is not what's required. The comment is wrong. >> @hostname is required for all vhosts lists regardless of the host name >> in the URL or the setting of VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW. >

Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-06-01 Thread Graham Leggett
On 29 May 2013, at 1:50 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Actually, that patch is not what's required. The comment is wrong. > @hostname is required for all vhosts lists regardless of the host name > in the URL or the setting of VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW. > > A correct patch is attached. I will give this a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-05-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/28/2013 04:48 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Here is another small issue, when VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW was switched off to > allow all virtual lists to appear on the same host, the host_name of the list > wasn't passed in the URL. The attached patch fixes this. > > diff -u -r mailman-2.1.12/

Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-05-28 Thread Graham Leggett
On 27 May 2013, at 5:21 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Fix accepted and committed to the branch at > . > > Thank you. Here is another small issue, when VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW was switched off to allow all virtual lists to appear on the same host, the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-05-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/27/2013 07:57 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Hopefully this fix doesn't fall into the too involved category. This sanity > check was failing even when the emailhost and domain were the same: Fix accepted and committed to the branch at . T

Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-05-27 Thread Graham Leggett
On 27 May 2013, at 4:05 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I'm not sure how that compares to what I'm familiar with. I have a > branch at based on > the work of Hans Ulrich Niedermann and predecessors. (See the FAQ at > and

Re: [Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-05-26 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/26/2013 06:33 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone managed to get the mailman true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 working on Redhat Enterprise 6 as described at https://wiki.koumbit.net/VirtualMailman? I'm not sure how that compares to what I'm familiar with. I have a branch a

[Mailman-Developers] true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 on RHEL6

2013-05-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, Has anyone managed to get the mailman true virtual hosting patch for 2.1 working on Redhat Enterprise 6 as described at https://wiki.koumbit.net/VirtualMailman? I have to apply the patch manually as it the patch fails in a few places, however once applied the patch doesn't seem to work