> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> I'd rather Barry concentrate his time on 2.1.
Me too! MM2.0.x is such stale code (in my brain) that it's basically
got to be a showstopper or security bug to get fixed at this point.
CVR> Agreed. Features go into new releases.
On 2/28/02 1:26 PM, "Marc MERLIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather Barry concentrate his time on 2.1. Feel free to upgrade and help
> us find any remaining problems if there are any.
Agreed. Features go into new releases. They have to be very persuasively
important to the universe to side
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:47:45PM +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > JM> Is it possible to set wildcards in the field 'Addresses of
> > JM> members accepted for postings to this list without implicit
> > JM> approval requirement' in Privacy Options? That every addr
> > JM> from domai
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:02:18PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> > "JM" == Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JM> Is it possible to set wildcards in the field 'Addresses of
> JM> members accepted for postings to this list without implicit
> JM> approval requirement' in Pr
> "JM" == Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> Is it possible to set wildcards in the field 'Addresses of
JM> members accepted for postings to this list without implicit
JM> approval requirement' in Privacy Options? That every addr
JM> from domain xyz.com is allowed
Hello,
Is it possible to set wildcards in the field 'Addresses of members
accepted for postings to this list without implicit approval
requirement' in Privacy Options?
That every addr from domain xyz.com is allowed to post without approval
requirement. If yes, how?
*@xyz.com or xyz.com or .*@xyz.
