Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python versions

2004-05-22 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
> "Daniel" == Daniel Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> Here's a summary of Python versions on other popular Daniel> distro's: [Linux reports elided] On Mac OS X 10.3 (aka Panther), we have Apple -> 2.3 IIRC Mac OS X 10.2 (aka Jaguar) was Python 2.1. On the third-par

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python versions (was: Re: RELEASED Mailman 2.1.5)

2004-05-22 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 18:45, John Dennis wrote: > FC2 which was just released has 2.3.3 as will RHEL4. Red Hat users if > they use Red Hat rpms will never have to build Python from source. Don't expect people to be running the current release all the time or to hold off mailman updates until OS re

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python versions (was: Re: RELEASED Mailman 2.1.5)

2004-05-20 Thread Carson Gaspar
--On Thursday, May 20, 2004 13:45:57 -0400 John Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FC2 which was just released has 2.3.3 as will RHEL4. Red Hat users if they use Red Hat rpms will never have to build Python from source. Speaking as a RHEL 3.0 (3.1 Real Soon Now - maybe this one will work!) custom

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python versions (was: Re: RELEASED Mailman 2.1.5)

2004-05-20 Thread John Dennis
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 06:22, Daniel Buchmann wrote: > Here's a summary of Python versions on other popular distro's: > > RedHat: > RedHat 8.0 has Python 2.2.1 > RedHat 9.0 has Python 2.2.2 > Fedora Core 1 has Python 2.2.3 > Looks like RedHat users will have to build Python from source if 2.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Python versions (was: Re: RELEASED Mailman 2.1.5)

2004-05-20 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:22 PM +0200 2004/05/20, Daniel Buchmann wrote: Looks like RedHat users will have to build Python from source if 2.3 becomes a requirement... :) Looks like this problem is already becoming a frequent question on mailman-users. We should put something into the FAQ to address this, or fix