On 05/11/2015 12:48 PM, Juraj Variny wrote:
>
> I have decided to modify Scrubber so that its work is split, when in normal
> pipeline it only saves the attachments to disk, does gpg stuff, but keeps
> message unchanged(only headers added). Message is then processed when called
> from archiver.
Thanks, it helped me to clear the confusion.
I have decided to modify Scrubber so that its work is split, when in normal
pipeline it only saves the attachments to disk, does gpg stuff, but keeps
message unchanged(only headers added). Message is then processed when called
from archiver.
The c
Thanks, it helped me to clear the confusion.
I have decided to modify Scrubber so that its work is split, when in normal
pipeline it only saves the attachments to disk, does gpg stuff, but keeps
message unchanged(only headers added). Message is then processed when called
from archiver.
The c
On 05/07/2015 01:59 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 07, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Juraj Variny wrote:
>
>> I have tried already to use msgdata parameter or adding headers to message
>> itself, but was not successful so far. I was thinking about adding external
>> database and putting the data there by m
On 05/07/2015 01:51 PM, Juraj Variny wrote:
>
> I am adapting the GPG patch for mailman 2.1.x for our project and want to
> gather
> some related data in Approve and Scrubber handlers and use them in the
> archiver.
> Can you please advise me how to attach some metadata to a message to use it
On May 07, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Juraj Variny wrote:
>I have tried already to use msgdata parameter or adding headers to message
>itself, but was not successful so far. I was thinking about adding external
>database and putting the data there by message ID, but sure there must be a
>better way? I hop
