On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 22:48:51 -0500
> From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New Bounce system
>
>
> > "DM" == Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
>Another wish... probation. I had a system with Majordomo, daily
>cron rotation of subscriber files, that I liked, hackish as it
>was. New subscribers were unable to send mail to a particular large
>and active list for a period of time (five days in my case) after
>subscribing. This was to force n
I must apologize in advance, since I haven't been paying that close
attention to recent developments here, and this may already be included.
I'd like it to be easy to set up mailman to run with greatly reduced
functionality (to run a single announcement (not discussion) list for a
site), which sh
>> I've got a patch to do that against 2.0.8 which works for new
>> lists. If someone could tell me what the right way is to add
>> an entry into an existing database I'd have a complete patch.
> "DM" == Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> I think Mailman/versions.py::
> "LW" == Lawrence Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LW> Another wish... probation. I had a system with Majordomo,
LW> daily cron rotation of subscriber files, that I liked, hackish
LW> as it was. New subscribers were unable to send mail to a
LW> particular large and active l
Neat! Note that in MM2.1 Mailman/Bouncer.py has a method
BounceMessage() that performs all the basic logic for bouncing
(rejecting) a message.
-Barry
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailma
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> First, of all, I'd like to say that I really like many of the
MM> changes in improvements in mailman cvs, some of them will same
MM> me a lot of time with not having to deal with confused users
MM> anymore :-)
Yay!
MM
>> The bounce message should be able to be customized giving the
>> user information to join the list - or just go to hell.
JCL> 2.1 is much better in this regard, but I'll have to see
JCL> if it went that far.
It doesn't. Anybody want to contribute some code?
-Barry
___
> "MP" == Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MP> I have set up the system and I've been running it for a few
MP> weeks and I really like it. But there's a few little missing
MP> features - many of which should be easy to add, that I hope
MP> you developers will consider.
> "DM" == Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> Mailed these to Barry too, but again, just in case anyone else
DM> is running into them before Barry gets to them:
These are (or will be when I travel in my time machine and get back
online) fixed in CVS.
Thanks!
-Barry
__
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:17:40 -0500
Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a time-based auto-de-probation feature will have to wait
> until after MM2.1.
At which time both based, # of posts based rule support would be
useful, along with the ability to take an existent member and appl
Once upon a time (Thu Jan 03), J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:17:40 -0500 Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think a time-based auto-de-probation feature will have to wait
>> until after MM2.1.
> At which time both based, # of posts based rule support would be
> useful,
Once upon a time (Thu Jan 03), Jerry Stratton wrote:
> A probation period would be a nice spam-deterrent also; I'm
> pretty sure we've had at least one person subscribe first, then
> send advertising immediately, to one of our lists.
Indeed, that was also a motivation for implementing the probat
Will 2.1 have the ability to just completey *drop* posts matching
a pattern, instead of holding them for moderation? I've got a couple
of lists where Re: posts (replies back to the list) arent allowed; only
initial problem messages and then a summary/solution posting.
It would be nice if I could
> "LW" == Lawrence Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The ability to have the list sig (as appended to posts) be
>> rotated thru a range of possible values.
LW> Yes... I have a Perl script that did that for me when I used
LW> Majordomo. It was in the MTA aliases processing
> "BB" == Bill Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BB> Will 2.1 have the ability to just completey *drop* posts
BB> matching a pattern, instead of holding them for moderation?
BB> I've got a couple of lists where Re: posts (replies back to
BB> the list) arent allowed; only i
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:14:11PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> MM> The main list admin's cookie should be valid for all the
> MM> lists. Having to retype the list password over and over again
> MM> as I hop from list to list is very tiring.
>
> Would the site admin password suffic
17 matches
Mail list logo
