[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-667232 ] Collapse CC: header

Bugs item #667232, was opened at 2003-01-13 11:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=667232&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned t

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-666235 ] sync_members bugs (possible fixes included)

Bugs item #666235, was opened at 2003-01-11 10:31 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=666235&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Eric Ding (ericding) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-664575 ] mailman 2.1 tarball permissions

Bugs item #664575, was opened at 2003-01-08 14:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=664575&group_id=103 Category: configuring/installing Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) A

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-665791 ] Hiding e-mail addresses breaks mbox archives

Bugs item #665791, was opened at 2003-01-10 10:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=665791&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Assigned to: N

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-663272 ] held message noticeoptions

Bugs item #663272, was opened at 2003-01-06 14:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=663272&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Bryan Fullerton (fehwalker) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-664466 ] 2.0 cookies break 2.1 web auth

Bugs item #664466, was opened at 2003-01-08 11:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=664466&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Bryan Fullerton (fehwalker) Assigned to: N

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-665732 ] List-Id should be oneline.

Bugs item #665732, was opened at 2003-01-10 09:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=665732&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Bernhard Reiter (ber) Assigned to: N

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-662504 ] Mailman Admin Notification Racing

Bugs item #662504, was opened at 2003-01-05 02:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=662504&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Ian Wilson (tacgeek) Assigned to: No

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-663675 ] Administrative interface vs. non-standardHTTP ports

Bugs item #663675, was opened at 2003-01-07 08:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=663675&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Fabricio Chalub (chalub) Assigned to: Nobo

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-662472 ] scrubber arbitrary extension change forattachments

Bugs item #662472, was opened at 2003-01-04 23:38 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=662472&group_id=103 Category: None Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Jorge Becerra (jlbpcuba) Assigned to: Nobody/

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-662127 ] Race condition with summary modification screen

Bugs item #662127, was opened at 2003-01-04 09:18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=662127&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: David Shaw (dmshaw) Assigned to: Nobody/An

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-662490 ] not mimetype return

Bugs item #662490, was opened at 2003-01-05 01:44 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=662490&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Jorge Becerra (jlbpcuba) Assigned to: Nobo

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-657443 ] Header and footer in multipart

Bugs item #657443, was opened at 2002-12-22 03:08 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=657443&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Demeilliez Bruno (dive_bruno) Assign

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-662163 ] Autoreplies confirm subscription invitations

Bugs item #662163, was opened at 2003-01-04 11:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=662163&group_id=103 Category: (un)subscribing Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Stonewall Ballard (stoneyb) Assign

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-659011 ] add_members -c publishes member list

Bugs item #659011, was opened at 2002-12-27 09:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=659011&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Jost Krieger (jkrieger) Assig

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-659014 ] decoration problems with German lists

Bugs item #659014, was opened at 2002-12-27 09:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=659014&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Jost Krieger (jkrieger) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-214205 ] e-mail<->usenet gateway Reply-To header (PR#303)

Bugs item #214205, was opened at 2000-09-11 16:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=214205&group_id=103 Category: nntp/news Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Ba

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-660733 ] pipermail date handling

Bugs item #660733, was opened at 2003-01-01 12:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=660733&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Bryan Fullerton (fehwalker) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-667167 ] Non-digest options configuration help

Bugs item #667167, was opened at 2003-01-13 09:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=667167&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: John Swartzentruber (jswartzen) Assigned t

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-658261 ] transcheck error fordouble %

Bugs item #658261, was opened at 2002-12-24 12:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=658261&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts >Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Simone Piunno (pioppo) Assign

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-658892 ] traceback EOF read where object expected

Bugs item #658892, was opened at 2002-12-27 01:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=658892&group_id=103 Category: None Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ubaida Othman (sirdeath) Assigned to: Nobo

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-655827 ] names w/ .'s + accents held for approval

Bugs item #655827, was opened at 2002-12-18 10:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=655827&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rob Ellis (robellis) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-611185 ] rmlist doesn't delete lock files

Bugs item #611185, was opened at 2002-09-18 13:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=611185&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts >Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Linda Julien (leira) Assigne

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-612784 ] feature-request : Use of Spamassassintag

Bugs item #612784, was opened at 2002-09-22 06:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=612784&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 1 Submitted By: Alexandre Dulaunoy (adulau) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-668664 ] ValueError processing held messages

Bugs item #668664, was opened at 2003-01-15 14:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=668664&group_id=103 Category: None Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bryan Fullerton (fehwalker) Assigned to: Nobod

[Mailman-Developers] problem with CGI after upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I get: Mailman CGI error!!! The Mailman CGI wrapper encountered a fatal error. This entry is being stored in your syslog: No such file or directory Can someone please point me to the cause of this problem? I am stumped. THANKS, - -asher -BEGI

Re: [Mailman-Developers] mm2.1 - DEFAULT_PLAIN_DIGEST_KEEP_HEADERS

Quoth Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | On Tuesday 14 January 2003 4:25 pm, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: ... |> BTW, if anybody else is going to be at the Spam conference, let me |> know. I'd love to have a chat about Mailman, spam and other stuffis. |> I'll be getting in Thursday night. | | I'd love

Re: [Mailman-Developers] problem with CGI after upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 arg, mail server was running a different install of linux than our standard clone, python2.2 was installed. - -asher On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Asher Yanich wrote: > --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- > > I get: > Ma

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-668685 ] sys.exit handling by script/driver

Patches item #668685, was opened at 2003-01-15 19:35 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=668685&group_id=103 Category: Web UI Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Barrett (ppsys) Assigned to: Nobod

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-444884 ] Integration of Mailman & htdig for archi

Patches item #444884, was opened at 2001-07-26 18:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=444884&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Richard Barrett (ppsys) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-444884 ] Integration of Mailman & htdig for archi

Patches item #444884, was opened at 2001-07-26 18:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=444884&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Richard Barrett (ppsys) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-444884 ] Integration of Mailman & htdig for archi

Patches item #444884, was opened at 2001-07-26 18:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=444884&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Richard Barrett (ppsys) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-668819 ] improve plain-ness and i18n-ness ofplain-text digest

Patches item #668819, was opened at 2003-01-16 00:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=668819&group_id=103 Category: internationalization Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Ass

Re: [Mailman-Developers] mm2.1 - DEFAULT_PLAIN_DIGEST_KEEP_HEADERS

Hi, Please try this patch. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=668819&group_id=103&atid=300103 Bryan Fullerton wrote: Howdy, Nobody seems to be answering questions in mailman-users (is Barry away?), so I'll try this one here. There's a setting in Defaults.py which seems

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-573505 ] usenet threading improvements

Patches item #573505, was opened at 2002-06-25 01:59 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=573505&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: Mailman 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 1 Submitted By: Mark Weaver (mdw21) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

It completely sucks, and has completely sucked ever since the decision was made a few months ago, that Mailman-Developers gets Cc'd on every Sourceforge update. I'm sure Barry (or whoever) felt they were doing a service, but it has practically killed discussion here and cost us many, many kilo

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

* Tom Neff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If you don't actually want to have a Developers discussion list, then shut > it down and let people submit stuff via Sourceforge only. If you do want > one, let us have one. How about a mailman-developers and mailman-bugsandpatches list?

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

> "TN" == Tom Neff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TN> It completely sucks, and has completely sucked ever since the TN> decision was made a few months ago, that Mailman-Developers TN> gets Cc'd on every Sourceforge update. I'm sure Barry (or TN> whoever) felt they were doing a s

[Mailman-Developers] Hello folks, I just joined the list

I'm in serious need I'm on a mailinglist run on (X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8). This list is desperately in need of the "limit posts per day" feature. I see it on the wishlist at (http://www.list.org/todo.html): Add a limit on the number of posts from any one individual within a period of tim

[Mailman-Developers] GetScriptURL and "absolute=1"

Hi, I still find that mailman's administrative interface behaves incorrectly on HTTPDs running on non-standard ports. It simply discards the port information out of the URL, despite DEFAULT_URL* settings. On some pages, the URL to the FORM ACTION is relative (eg, the "General Options" form) w

[Mailman-Developers] bug report : nntp connect failure does not specify host nameZ

Hi, I'm sorry, I tried to submit a bug report via the SourceForge project page, but could not find any buttons or links on the 'bugs' and 'tracker' pages that would let me submit a new bug report. I am using Mailman 2.0.13 as included RedHat Linux 7.2. When mailman is unable to make an nntp conne

[Mailman-Developers] RE: Listserv Maximum

Is there a listserv maximum number? * * "You grow up the day you have your first * * Terri Slater real laugh - at yourself.* * Web Programmer

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hello folks, I just joined the list

Its probably not too hard. In my experience (I wrote a patch that I posted here to prevent mailman 2.0.x from allowing posts from non-subscribers since I didn't want to deal with manually dropping all the spam) you could auto-reject above a certian number by adding a check against a python diction

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications consideredharmful

Barry wrote: That's definitely the /last/ thing I wanted to do! I think it's worse now because 2.1 is out, people are finding it, playing with it, and are submitting bugs and patches against it. ... I hope I didn't sound too ungrateful or anything. I don't know whether or how my suggested solu

[Mailman-Developers] subscribing via email...

what parameter can I include in the email to override the default 'plain' so that MIMEs are included for the subscriber when receiving their daily newsletter? Many thanks! -j ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.or

[Mailman-Developers] preventing double messages

Hello, I'm on a few lists of 1 and the same mailman. It occurs that someone sends 1 e-mail to multiple of those lists. Then i get the same message more than once. This could be prevented: For every incoming mail: Not start sending to all members of all receiving lists right away, but hold a temp-

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:12:07AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > a. I create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list > > b. Send SF tracker messages to this list instead of mailman-developers > > c. Possibly (and I think optimally), retire mailman-checkins and send >the cvs diffs to mailman-coders as wel

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-451475 ] header munging ruins threading

Bugs item #451475, was opened at 2001-08-16 03:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=451475&group_id=103 Category: nntp/news Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: CrackMonkey (monkeymaster) Assigned to: B

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-573505 ] usenet threading improvements

Patches item #573505, was opened at 2002-06-25 01:59 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=573505&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: Mailman 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 1 Submitted By: Mark Weaver (mdw21) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [LO] Huge messages... a problem whilemoderating

Just soem replies: (i) I worked on Majordomo earlier, and found it (despite its other shortcomings and lack-of-development for years) to be rather precise and easy-to-operate if one opted to send in commands via email. Perhaps Majordomo's strong dependence on email is based on the fact that it

[Mailman-Developers] update on: AOL dropping e-mail

FYI for those that are interested, I've posted an update on my earlier note on AOL dropping e-mail. I wish I had good news, but... chuq -- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.plaidworks.com/chuqui/blog/ But I can hear