Alle 01:51, venerdì 31 ottobre 2003, J C Lawrence ha scritto:
> > A test installation (or a poor man's installation) will fetch messages
> > from pop3 mailboxes...
>
> Hell no. Mailman is a conformant well behaved and very standard mail
> system, not a hack on top of a kludge that deliberately fl
At 8:20 PM -0500 2003/10/30, J C Lawrence wrote:
While I don't disagree, this is really an MTA's job, not Mailman's.
This is why I've been doing log analysis of MXes and routing mail to
customised outbound MTAs on the basis of responsiveness, since early
2000. Adaptive MX routing is great stu
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:21:20 +0100
Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alle 01:51, venerdì 31 ottobre 2003, J C Lawrence ha scritto:
>>> A test installation (or a poor man's installation) will fetch
>>> messages from pop3 mailboxes...
>> Hell no. Mailman is a conformant well behaved and
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:04:43 +0100
Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 8:20 PM -0500 2003/10/30, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> While I don't disagree, this is really an MTA's job, not Mailman's.
>> This is why I've been doing log analysis of MXes and routing mail to
>> customised outbound MTAs
On Friday 31 October 2003 20:17, J C Lawrence wrote:
> Right, but the information lost across the non-SMTP translation is
> irretrievable and necessary.
sorry, I don't get it.
Right now we're receiving messages over a pipe and as far as I see we're not
using any environment or command line param
At 10:04 PM +0100 2003/10/31, Simone Piunno wrote:
Right now we're receiving messages over a pipe and as far as I see we're not
using any environment or command line parameter (beside the script name) so
where's this SMTP magic?
You mean the envelope sender address? The IP address of the
env
On Friday 31 October 2003 22:30, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > Right now we're receiving messages over a pipe and as far as I see we're
> > not using any environment or command line parameter (beside the script
> > name) so where's this SMTP magic?
>
> You mean the envelope sender address? The I
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:26:08 +0100
Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 31 October 2003 22:30, Brad Knowles wrote:
>>> Right now we're receiving messages over a pipe and as far as I see
>>> we're not using any environment or command line parameter (beside
>>> the script name) so w
