Hello,
I'm looking for feedback about the attached one line patch, It uses
existing capabilities to allow the editing of subscribeack.txt. If this
is the right approach I would be happy to follow up with additional
patches to help support this capability. The first thing that comes to
mind adju
Hi Developers and I18Ners,
I've bumped version number of mailman to 2.1.6a2 (a1 was not announced)
and made a tarball at my mailman-japanese site. Please get it at:
http://mm.tkikuchi.net/mailman-2.1.6a2.tgz
Mailman 2.1.6 should be compatible with Python 2.4 and including some
nice new features su
David Relson wrote:
Does that mean it's _not_ compatible with older versions of python ???
It _is_ compatible with Python 2.1.3 and higher, I believe. It includes
compatibility fix for the newer Python 2.4.
--
Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp
http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/
___
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:35:01 +0900
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> Hi Developers and I18Ners,
>
> I've bumped version number of mailman to 2.1.6a2 (a1 was not
announced)
> and made a tarball at my mailman-japanese site. Please get it at:
> http://mm.tkikuchi.net/mailman-2.1.6a2.tgz
>
> Mailman 2.1.6 shou
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 21:23, David Relson wrote:
> Does that mean it's _not_ compatible with older versions of python ???
I think it's fair to say we want to continue Python 2.1 compatibility
with the Mailman 2.1 series.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:49:18 +0900
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Does that mean it's _not_ compatible with older versions of python
> > ???
>
> It _is_ compatible with Python 2.1.3 and higher, I believe. It
> includes compatibility fix for the newer Python 2.4.
The cl
