> "Bob" == Bob Puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> Personally, I'd much rather see the HT/Dig patch implemented
Bob> before this one. That is IMHO more useful to the average
Bob> mailman admin than this.
Jeff's patch is so simple you could prove its correctness
mathematically.
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brad> At 5:37 PM +0900 2005-05-03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> It's not a good idea to put the burden of proof on them, when
>> either the list-owner can be more selective about membership,
>> or they can use X-No-Archive.
At 7:17 PM +0900 2005-05-06, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Maybe you could make it part of the user's configuration. Then the
> list master could default it to X-No-Archive: yes; individual users
> could turn it to no if they want to, including on a message by message
> basis. A stretch, I kn
Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 7:17 PM +0900 2005-05-06, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
>
>
>> Maybe you could make it part of the user's configuration. Then the
>> list master could default it to X-No-Archive: yes; individual users
>> could turn it to no if they want to, including on a message by messa
