Re: [Mailman-Developers] Patches in mandriva package

2006-09-12 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry that I was unable to respond. > > Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote: >> >>> I'd like to use this occasion to drop a maximum of patches we still >>> have: >>> - is 2.1.9 still vulnearble to CVE-2005-3573 ? I didn't f

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Patches in mandriva package

2006-09-12 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> - the default build procedure is not suited to package building: it >>> check target directory directly (which doesn't exist), and leave >>> reference to package build root in python bytecode files. The patches >>> [2] and [3] fixes those issues, maybe they could get integra

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Patches in mandriva package

2006-09-12 Thread ????
Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >ToDigest.send_digests() can block regular delivery. We put the >send_digests() calling part in a try/except clause and leave a message >in the error log if something happened in send_digests(). Daily call of >cron/senddigests will provide more detail to the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Patches in mandriva package

2006-09-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:38 AM, wrote: > Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >>ToDigest.send_digests() can block regular delivery. We put the >>send_digests() calling part in a try/except clause and leave a >> message >>in the error log if something happened in send_digests(). >> Daily call

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Patches in mandriva package

2006-09-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Sorry, here they are: > http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/SPECS/mailman/mailman- > buildroot-check.patch?view=log > http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/SPECS/mailman/ > mailman-2

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Patches in mandriva package

2006-09-12 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? >> func=detail&aid=1556858&group_id=103&atid=300103 >> >> I think I will commit in the Release-2.1-maint branch and include >> in the >> 2.1.9 final release. I appreciate anyone can review the patch. > > Let's wait for 2.1.10, because otherwise we'r