Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think you're both right :). Mailman 2.1 will strip recipients from
> the CC header if explicitly named recipients are members of the list and
> have nodup set. But Mailman won't strip To headers, nor juggle CC and
> To headers after stripping.
Is see. But wouldn't it b
> Dan MacNeil writes:
> > For my selfish purposes, "no-dupes" off is a better default setting.
> > Without a copy of the message to their mailbox, many of my users will
> > keep sending the same message because it "didn't go".
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Are you thinking of not-metoo?
Err, ye
Hi all,
here's finally my next proposal for a less broken but yet very useful
reply-to-munging:
- Motivation
Non-technical users (generally) love defaults. They don't wanna have to
choose between three different kind of reply buttons. And no-way they want
to change their MUA they just got pai
