On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:24:57PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I've looked at the patch, and I wonder why it doesn't include the '<'
> and '>' in the log entries. According to RFC 2822, the '<' and '>' are
I had a vague wrong impression that Mailman didn't include them in the
logs; I've uploaded a
On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Terri Oda wrote:
> On 11-Mar-08, at 11:00 AM, Jason Pruim wrote:
>
> I like this style when you have a smaller number of questions, but
> there are probably over 200 entries in the the Mailman FAQ. I think
> putting them all on one page is less than ideal:
>
> (
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:06:22PM +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> > So its an HTTP GET - which is supposed to be idempotent. I know a
> > while back there was discussion of SpamAssassin modules which
> > evaluated linked webpages for spamminess - presumably that action
> > would clear someone off th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am happy to announce the next beta release of Mailman 2.1.10.
This is a security and bug fix release and it is highly recommended
that all sites upgrade to this version. Mailman 2.1.10 also adds support
for three new language translations, Galician,
