OK, I've opened a bug on Launchpad to attach my very basic
implementation (plus a unit test). It's just 3 lines, it does not
implement Stephen's suggestion (which is probably better but involves
some refactoring). Here is the ticket:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1291452
I've tested it on
Hi
I hope my mail hasn't missed your attention. I would be very much obliged
if someone could answer this question so that I can go ahead and write
proposal.
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Bhargav Golla wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have gone through the Admin interface and all functions that
Bhargav Golla writes:
> I hope my mail hasn't missed your attention. I would be very much
> obliged if someone could answer this question so that I can go
> ahead and write proposal.
First, it's impolite to send mail to specific people just because
they're answered you before, unless they are
On Mar 12, 2014, at 01:43 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Offhand I'd say that having both a Member rule and a NonMember rule is
>a bad idea. There should be one conceptual test: can we identify a
>member as the originator of this post? Having Member and NonMember
>rules that can both "succeed"
Hi Stephen
Thanks for your feedback. I sincerely apologize for CC'ing people in the
mail who weren't mentors. But, during my experience with work at ASF, I was
asked to mention the project head in all mails when there is no mentor
assigned on an idea. That is solely the reason why I included Terri
