Andrew Stuart writes:
> >>>Do you think this has to be integrated into the core for 3.0?
> >>>I'd still prefer to keep it separate for better experimentation
> >>>and testing.
> the alternative for me is to go ahead with deploying application
> data and domainowner and serverowner into the
On Sat 2015-02-21 08:49:49 -0500, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> You can say "I know that". The problem is that your users frequently
> will not, and may read more into "*full* anonymization" than can
> possibly be delivered. If we're going to deliver this feature as part
> of Mailman, it's rea
On Monday 9. February 2015 23.57.56 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 09, 2015, at 02:45 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >Shall we go ahead and make it the default theme for new users?
>
> +1
While away from my computer and thus unable to really do anything, I noticed
that the theme resources for various ex
Yes that’s a reasonable line of thought Stephen. You are correct I haven’t made
any attempt to integrate with enterprise auth systems. Also, I’ll avoid
describing my auth server as ‘the auth server’.
Is there anything that would define what sort of functionality is required for
enterprise integ
