On 10/31/2016 03:08 PM, Eric Searcy wrote:
>
> That reminds me. I have a proposed idea for another nice-to-have, that
> I'm mentioning now in case it has any impact on the architecture you are
> describing. Some email systems (e.g. Exchange) do not accept any
> inbound email crossing their edge
Dear all,
I'd like to probe the feasibility of this option.
The idea is to add a footer only in case it is not present, similar to what is
done with subject_prefix. By properly setting both of them, a sender can
submit what can be called a camera-ready post. Since no change applies, no
DKIM
At 11:06 AM 11/5/2016, Mark Sapiro wrote:
However, I've just become aware that Microsoft has implemented another
"feature". So far, the info I have is this is limited to their "hosted
mail services", but it may well spread. What they are doing is looking
at incoming mail for signs of spoofing/ph
On 11/05/2016 04:11 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> The idea is to add a footer only in case it is not present, similar to
> what is done with subject_prefix. By properly setting both of them, a
> sender can submit what can be called a camera-ready post. Since no
> change applies, no DKIM signa