Hi Franck,
At 22:44 12-09-2013, Franck Martin wrote:
In the upcoming mailman 2.1.16 there has been the introduction of
the optional feature author_is_list
Replace the sender with the list address to conform with policies
like ADSP and DMARC. It replaces the poster's address in the From:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:30 PM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
Hi Franck,
At 22:44 12-09-2013, Franck Martin wrote:
In the upcoming mailman 2.1.16 there has been the introduction of the
optional feature author_is_list
Replace the sender with the list address to conform with policies like ADSP
On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Unfortunately some list admins cannot edit mm_cfg.py (like CPANEL type
install), therefore it would be nice to remove ALLOW_AUTHOR_IS_LIST or set it
to Yes by default to let the list admin decide how he/she wants the list to
behave. Otherwise the
Franck Martin writes:
In the upcoming mailman 2.1.16 there has been the introduction of
the optional feature author_is_list
Replace the sender
Before you release, s/sender/author/, please. When discussing
Internet email, sender != author. The name of the feature, author is
list, is an
Mark Sapiro writes:
Franck has assured me that this feature can be useful even in the
absence of the DNS and MTA changes necessary to DKIM sign outgoing
list mail,
That's nonsense. There's no reason to do this in the absence of
correct DKIM signatures by Mailman or its MTA, and every
On 09/13/2013 08:06 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I will leave it to Mark for final decision on this, but my own opinion is that
the mm_cfg.py option should stay. cPanel already customizes their Mailman
installation, so I think they should set it to Yes when they upgrade their
systems to 2.1.16.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net
To: mailman-developers@python.org
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:31:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Author_is_list option in upcoming mailman
2.1.16
On 09/13/2013 08:06 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I will leave
Franck Martin writes:
we (the people using DMARC) have the opportunity to build
adoption. Just trying to reduce adoption friction ;)
The direction you're heading will *create* adoption friction. The
only way you're going to be able to sell this to admins like me is to
wait until our users
One may argue that since the list is modifying the message, it is now the new
author of it, this proposal just make it more clearly.
In an ideal world, lists should only forward the email, preserving the DKIM
signature, but few lists are doing that except the notable exception of
apache.org
On 09/13/2013 12:18 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Mailman breaks DKIM as soon as you add a footer or tag in the subject line,
which a lot of lists do (including this one).
Not necessarily. It depends on the DKIM signature and how much of the
body is signed. Granted, you are correct in most
10 matches
Mail list logo
