On 13-03-01 01:43 PM, Chris Cargile wrote:
On the matter of communications, I might hope to take yet a moment to
address my goals, motivations, and expectations for contributing to the
quite-worthy, well-thought-out and respectable mailman3 *team* effort and
re-establish what might be already see
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:59:24 +0200, Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However there's something that could be very useful, that would be "search
> fuzzy matches", for instance if <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes to me saying
> that he needs to be unsubscribed, I can't easily locate his subscription if
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:36:55 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And also, mailman 2.2 will no be out before next summer. I expect many
> venders are including Python 2.4 by that time.
As a perhaps extraneous data point supporting this, the FreeBSD
lang/python port was bumped from
Hi Tokio et al,
Is there a roadmap for 2.1.6 betas and release? Haven't seen anything
since this post. (but maybe I missed a message?)
Thanks,
Bryan
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:35:01 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Developers and I18Ners,
>
> I've bumped version number of mailma
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:55:51 -0800, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First is all text entered via the web admin interface is HTML escaped
> resulting in the <, etc.
>
> To avoid this, set the text for member_moderation_notice using
> bin/config_list instead of using the web interface.
Th
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:32:58 -0800, Chuq Von Rospach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I think its safe to say that it's not lack of interest or intent here
> with any of us, but a lack of free time. And time, of course is one
> commodity you can't do much about some times.
Ditto. My daughter ju
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:15:44 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I plan on installing the current 2.1.6
> on my various sites and I hope others can do the same thing to help test
> 2.1.6 in order to get an end-of-February release.
I'm willing to install the pending beta 4 if it
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:03:34 +0800, pabs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this list broken, or has everyone left?
Everyone's waiting expectantly for 2.1.6 to come out. I expect
there'll be a bunch of posts of various types once that happens. :)
Bryan
___
Is there an updated timeline for the final 2.1.6 release? It won't be
in February... :)
Thanks,
Bryan
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:46:19 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I've pushed the 2.1.6b4 tarball out to SourceForge (now that file
> uploads are working again ;). I will like
Yay, upgraded. :)
Is the bug you mentioned below filed on SF? Just wondering what the
issue is, and specifically if this will fix a problem I've seen with
SpamAssassin-tagged mail leaking through to my mailman@ list despite a
header_filter_rule that really should be blocking it... but haven't
had
On 8/17/05, Joseph Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that when I use a web interface to create or delete a
> mailing list, (CGI or my XMLRPC interface), the ownership of my
> data/aliases file does not change. However if I use bin/newlist or
> bin/rmlist as root, the ownership on data
On 8/31/05, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the very least, we must drop Python 2.1 and 2.2.
+1
> If we must continue to support Python 2.3, so be it, but I'd like
> to leapfrog even that version. There are several Python 2.4 constructs
> and modules that I'd dearly love to be able
On 9/2/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This version is not yet recommended for production environments,
> however testing and feedback is greatly encouraged. My plan is to
> release 2.1.9 final by 10-Sep-2006. A more detailed list of changes
> will be included in the final release a
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> I noticed MM 2.0.9 available for download on sourceforge, but I never
> saw an announcement for it. Checking the mailman-announce archives
> confirms this. Was this intentional?
It's also not on ftp.gnu.org yet, which combine
his address book, he grabbed all of those
> addresses, too.
The perils of Ease of Use. I have a crapload of people in my OS X
Address Book
that Mail.app's been happily storing away for a rainy day. Luckily for
them, I'm not
likely to be excited enough about anything to add them a
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:48 AM, John W Baxter wrote:
At 1:02 -0500 11/20/2002, Phil Barnett wrote:
Sending passwords as plaintext in 2002 is downright negligent
considering the
current state of sniffing, monitoring and penetration.
So...we stop calling them passwords.
I'm on so m
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 03:49 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
Unfortunately, for some reason bin/check_perms doesn't check
permissions on the aliases* files in the data directory - this should
be fixed (I'll look at a patch in a bit).
Just looking at this, there's a commen
Howdy,
Nobody seems to be answering questions in mailman-users (is Barry
away?), so I'll try this one here.
There's a setting in Defaults.py which seems to be just what my
customers are looking for to limit the headers being shown in their
plain digests - DEFAULT_PLAIN_DIGEST_KEEP_HEADERS. How
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 04:25 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
I've been swamped with Zope work, a upcoming studio project, and
getting ready for the Spam conference. Trust me, I'm taking all these
messages with me on my laptop. 6:30 hours each way on the train
should give me plenty of time
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 05:32 PM, Kory Wheatley wrote:
I received the below error when I tried to create a mailing list from
the Mailman web interface page. It did add the list into the alias
file,
but it
failed to run "postalias" probably because of permission issue's I'm
guessing.
I
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 12:12 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
3. Do a + b + c
I don't entirely understand this -1/0/+1 thing, but option 3 would be
my preference.
Bryan
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 07:24 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Please try this patch.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
index.php?func=detail&aid=668819&group_id=103&atid=300103
This looks good. I've applied it - will let you know how digests look
when they go out (midnight).
Thanks!
Bry
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 09:06 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 07:24 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Please try this patch.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
index.php?func=detail&aid=668819&group_id=103&atid=300103
This looks good. I've appl
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 09:49 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
wouldn't be a good idea to log the start and stop of mailmanctl in the
syslog?
This information is effectively logged in logs/qrunner, as seen below,
though it might be nice to have a single log-line entry indicating the
commands pa
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 10:05 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
Mybe I should rephrase my question.
Would'nt it be better if mailman can log either in a logfile or in a
user
configurable SysLog facility?
I mean, for each logfile that mm creates, could it be possible to
specify a
filename or a sy
Howdy,
Is there an ETA on 2.1.1? It's hard to justify using sources from CVS
in production, and it's becoming a bit annoying trying to remember all
the patches to apply when a new fix comes along. :)
Thanks,
Bryan
___
Mailman-Developers mailing lis
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Unfortunately no. Due to recent changes in my work situation, I'm
only able to work on Mailman in my spare time these days.
Ah, that sucks.
I find it's nearly impossible just to keep up on the lists.
Yeah, release of 2.1 has
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 10:45 AM, Bill Bradford wrote:
2.1 works fine for me, *except*
When I go to http://mysite/mailman/admindb/, it asks for the
list password. I give it, get the "held for moderation/approval" queue
of messages, pick my choices on each, and hit submit.
I then get
Someone might want to look at this.
admin.root:/> host www.list.org
Host not found.
admin.root:/> host list.org
list.org mail is handled (pri=100) by colossus.bilow.com
list.org mail is handled (pri=10) by mail.zork.org
I tried direct queries to all the listed name servers, none are
returning A r
29 matches
Mail list logo
