> "JWB" == John W Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JWB> Should mailman be picking the outside archiver to use, or
JWB> should it just make it easy to use SOME outside archiver?
It should, and it does, AFAIK. If there are specific problems with
external archive integration, let me
At 9:58 +0900 10/10/2001, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
>Yes, this is probably the right solution. In fact, I'm actually
>leaning towards suggesting that Mailman just come with or depend
>upon hypermail for archiving; we're just re-inventing the wheel
>by trying to modify pipermail over and over, and it'
> "BG" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BG> On a massive list (Mailman 2.0.6) I run that regularly gets a
BG> few hundred or more emails every day, things begin to slow
BG> down to molasses after a week or two each month, with the
BG> qrunner process taking liter
Sorry about the busted references, I'm on the digest.
> "ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
ben> On a massive list (Mailman 2.0.6) I run that regularly gets a
ben> few hundred or more emails every day, things begin to slow
ben> down to molasses after a week or two
On a massive list (Mailman 2.0.6) I run that regularly gets a few
hundred or more emails every day, things begin to slow down to
molasses after a week or two each month, with the qrunner process
taking literally HUNDREDS of megabytes of RAM, and 100% CPU, all the
time.
It's gotten so bad that the
