On 03/16/2016 07:21 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> I'll file bugs on both projects for this.
Thanks Barry.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
___
On Mar 15, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>The first question is should it be mailman-us...@mailman3.org or
>mailman-us...@mailman3.org.
That's mailman3-us...@mailman3.org or mailman-us...@mailman3.org.
The main question I have is, will mailman-us...@mailman3.org be easily
confused with
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:35:55PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> The first question is should it be mailman-us...@mailman3.org or
> mailman-us...@mailman3.org. The former is more of a recognition that
> Mailman 3 is now Mailman while the latter offers less possibility for
> confusion with
On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Simon Hanna wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 06:35 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> The first question is should it be mailman-us...@mailman3.org or
>> mailman-us...@mailman3.org. The former is more of a recognition that
>> Mailman 3 is now Mailman while the latter offers less
On 03/16/2016 06:35 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Some of you may have seen my posts on mailman-cabal, but I am installing
> a production instance of Mailman 3 on lists.mailman3.org in order to
> support initially a Mailman 3 users list.
>
> The first question is should it be
Some of you may have seen my posts on mailman-cabal, but I am installing
a production instance of Mailman 3 on lists.mailman3.org in order to
support initially a Mailman 3 users list.
The first question is should it be mailman-us...@mailman3.org or
mailman-us...@mailman3.org. The former is more