Re: [Mailman-Developers] Indirect Spam Vulnerability

2003-06-20 Thread Simone Piunno
On Thursday 19 June 2003 00:38, Matt Helsley wrote: I have two lists: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The spammer sends forged as [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mail gets held for approval and a message gets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] informing it that the

[Mailman-Developers] Indirect Spam Vulnerability

2003-06-18 Thread Matt Helsley
I thought I'd describe a spam problem related to mailman I'm having and propose the solution. If anyone can tell me one way or another whether mailman avoids this spam attack I would appreciate it. I have two lists: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The spammer sends forged

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Indirect Spam Vulnerability

2003-06-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 18:38, Matt Helsley wrote: I have two lists: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The spammer sends forged as [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mail gets held for approval and a message gets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] informing it that the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Indirect Spam Vulnerability

2003-06-18 Thread Matt Helsley
On 18 Jun 2003, Barry Warsaw wrote: Couldn't mailman redirect bounce/moderation notifications in the case where the FROM address is a mailman list and send it to the site/list administrator instead (or maybe drop it completely??)? I think this would avoid spamming the list subscribers