Chuq == Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chuq You know, now that I think of it, there's another approach:
Chuq you don't get the admin's email address until you
Chuq authenticate. Then you get it. [...]
Chuq Thoughts?
You've just reinvented TMDA, basically, except
On Friday 22 February 2002 14:36, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
On 2/21/02 5:25 PM, John Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody has bothered to do this YET. That we know of. But the spamhacks
are evolving rapidly.
Well, let's find out shall we? Set up a honeypot private list containing
a
On 2/21/02 6:38 PM, John Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, John? I've been doing that for months. It's a standard tactic I use to
test for archive harvests. No offense, but given I'd already thought of the
subscribe and harvest attack, wouldn't you think I also would have looked
for ways
On Friday 22 February 2002 16:36, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
Excellent. Would you mind publishing an analysis so we can start making
some informed decisions as to what methods are effective?
Oh, that's easy. I haven't found evidence of any harvesting. I've also been
able to find evidence of
