Re: [Mailman-Users] Help! My list digest users overwhelmed

2001-05-06 Thread Louiza
At 10:48 PM -0700 5/6/01, J C Lawrence wrote: >Examine the recieved headers of some of the dupes. The odds are >high that it has nothing to do with your system, and that it has >everything to do with broken software at their end(s). This usually >happens with broken MTAs delivering to even more

Re: [Mailman-Users] Help! My list digest users overwhelmed

2001-05-06 Thread J C Lawrence
On Sun, 6 May 2001 19:34:00 -0700 louiza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The digest users of my list have been overwhelmed with multiple > posts (upwards to 100) of the same digest version today. I do not > know how to solve this problem. Can anyone help me please? Examine the recieved headers of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Help! My list digest users overwhelmed

2001-05-06 Thread JC Dill
On 07:34 PM 5/6/01, Louiza wrote: >Hello, > >The digest users of my list have been overwhelmed with multiple posts >(upwards to 100) of the same digest version today. I do not know how >to solve this problem. Can anyone help me please? Look at your MTA queue. This is usually a problem with

[Mailman-Users] Help! My list digest users overwhelmed

2001-05-06 Thread Louiza
Hello, The digest users of my list have been overwhelmed with multiple posts (upwards to 100) of the same digest version today. I do not know how to solve this problem. Can anyone help me please? Regards, Louiza -- Mailman-Users maillist -

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.0.5 broken on RH70

2001-05-06 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JM" == Joe Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> So, I use the admin interface to check pending admin JM> requests--boom!--and it ain't happy. JM> Suggestions? Yes. A typo crept into the 2.0.5 tarball that I uploaded to SF on Friday. I've just uploaded a fixed tarball, so

[Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.0.5 patch

2001-05-06 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BAW> I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to BAW> SourceForge. Please check out The 2.0.5 tarball had a bug in the admindb.py. Thanks to Phil Barnett who helped discover this. The patch file did not have the bug.

[Mailman-Users] Reminders getting wrong Sender/Errors...

2001-05-06 Thread Pug Bainter
Good Morning, I did a search on this but couldn't find anything current. I am using Mailman 2.0.5 (recent upgrade from 2.0.3). On the first, the password reminders were sent out with the wrong information. They apprently went out with the list information for our *first* mailing list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Number of Subscribers

2001-05-06 Thread Bill Bradford
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:35:38PM +0200, Robert Krimmer wrote: > hi! > I'm using Mailman 1.08b8 to send out a weekly newsletter. What my sysadmin > couldn't tell me was, how to add the current number of users to each > newsletter. Is there a variable that can be inserted to the text? > thx, > rob

[Mailman-Users] Number of Subscribers

2001-05-06 Thread Robert Krimmer
hi! I'm using Mailman 1.08b8 to send out a weekly newsletter. What my sysadmin couldn't tell me was, how to add the current number of users to each newsletter. Is there a variable that can be inserted to the text? thx, robert krimmer *

[Mailman-Users] 2.0.5 broken on RH70

2001-05-06 Thread Joe Morris
I was using MM2.0 and upgraded yesterday to prepare a new server. Mailman 2.0 was running fine before. Python is 1.5.2. During compilation, I got the following warnings repeatedly... ./cgi-wrapper.c:26:21: warning: nothing can be pasted after this token ./cgi-wrapper.c:31:24: warning: pasting w

RE: [Mailman-Users] Virtual Hosts (was wierd errors in maillog

2001-05-06 Thread Cal Evans
When I asked the question, someone suggested that they had compiled separate copies of mailman for each virtual domain. This works. It's how I'm now running. Before adopting this I did some research into the code. While I am not a Python programmer, it would seem to me that one step that could b