Mark,
Bingo!
The script from the sourceforge site works fine. Here are the
diffs between that version and the version that Apple is providing. Note the
change of address of Foundation and the ill-fated option in the Apple-supplied
version to disable mail for the new subscriber. ( is official
Hi all,
Can any of you tell me how to validate the below scenario?
Ensure that the IUT sends CRCX including Callid which is unique within
the list of call agents that control the same gateway.
IUT in the above scenario is Call Agent(MGC).
Kindly tell me the test procedure for the above
Hi all,
Can any of you tell me how to validate the below scenario?
Ensure that the IUT sends CRCX including Callid which is unique within
the list of call agents that control the same gateway.
IUT in the above scenario is Call Agent(MGC).
Kindly tell me the test procedure for the above
What make/model of MGC? Also, do you know that it is presently not unique?
-Jim P.
geetha wrote:
Hi all,
Can any of you tell me how to validate the below scenario?
Ensure that the IUT sends CRCX including Callid which is unique within
the list of call agents that control the same
I'm looking at messages posted to a mailman-driven open-source
development email list (on mail.gnome.org/archives), and I've
downloaded the g-zip archives I want. When I extract the files, I get
one .txt file, and one or more attachment folders (with the suffix
.txt.attachment00,
Dave Yeats wrote:
I'm looking at messages posted to a mailman-driven open-source
development email list (on mail.gnome.org/archives), and I've
downloaded the g-zip archives I want. When I extract the files, I get
one .txt file, and one or more attachment folders (with the suffix
Allan Hansen wrote:
So Apple's version does, indeed, appear to be an Apple hack gone awry.
I suppose it could be fixed by extracting the address before sending
the member to setDeliveryStatus, but I'll refrain from that.
Yes, but why? See below for fix, but the hack adds the --enabled option
to
Dave Yeats wrote:
On 2/28/06, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, a .gz (gzipped) file does not contain a hierarchy of folders and
files unless it is a gzip of a .tar or other archive. Where are these
coming from in your case?
I'm looking at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evince-list/
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Allan Hansen wrote:
So Apple's version does, indeed, appear to be an Apple hack gone awry.
I suppose it could be fixed by extracting the address before sending
the member to setDeliveryStatus, but I'll refrain from that.
Yes, but why?
Upon rereading my post, I see the
michael dunston said the following on 2/28/2006 2:31 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 11:48 AM (-0800) Monday, February 27,
2006:
I noticed in the documentation that the 3.2 version of htdig is not
supported by the patches for using htdig with mailman. I've tried
rolling it back to version 3.1.6 but
Hi:
Im using mailman for one of our mailing lists, but I have a hard time
configuring it. If someone replies to the a mail that’s sent to the mailing
list, it goes to everybody on the list, as if I sent a mail to the list. How
can I stop that? I tried everything, but no luck!
Thanks in
Glenn Sieb said the following on 2/28/2006 12:50 PM:
I don't recall having to do anything special in this situation. I'm
running 2.1.7 with htdig 3.2.0b6 ...
I did customize my htdig setup, so that my logo, color scheme and such
are used, and I put all that in the templates/en/htdig_conf.txt
Glenn Sieb said the following on 2/28/2006 1:13 PM:
Glenn Sieb said the following on 2/28/2006 12:50 PM:
I don't recall having to do anything special in this situation. I'm
running 2.1.7 with htdig 3.2.0b6 ...
I did customize my htdig setup, so that my logo, color scheme and such
are used,
Sesiri Pathirane wrote:
If someone replies to the a mail that’s sent to the mailing list, it
goes to everybody on the list, as if I sent a mail to the list. How
can I stop that? I tried everything, but no luck!
On the list's general options page you want
first_strip_reply_to = No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sesiri Pathirane wrote:
Im using mailman for one of our mailing lists, but I have a hard
time configuring it. If someone replies to the a mail that’s sent to
the mailing list, it goes to everybody on the list, as if I sent a
mail to the list. How
Sesiri Pathirane wrote:
Thanks for the Reply on the list. I had selected first_reply_to = no and
reply_goes_to_list = poster. But when people reply to the list, it went to
everybody on the list. I need to set it up where, if anyone replies to the
list, it goes to the list admin. How do I do that?
Thank you for clarifying, Mark.
I do not yet have the knowledge to fix it, thus my comment. I do
appreciate the fix, though, because a number of my subscribers do
want to be subscribed inactive from a second address that they use
for posts (and they don't want duplicates). So I'll use your
Allan Hansen wrote:
Thank you for clarifying, Mark.
I do not yet have the knowledge to fix it, thus my comment. I do
appreciate the fix, though, because a number of my subscribers do
want to be subscribed inactive from a second address that they use
for posts (and they don't want duplicates). So
On 2/28/06, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Hansen wrote:
Thank you for clarifying, Mark.
I do not yet have the knowledge to fix it, thus my comment. I do
appreciate the fix, though, because a number of my subscribers do
want to be subscribed inactive from a second address that they
Bryan Carbonnell sent the message below at 11:29 2/28/2006:
On 2/28/06, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Hansen wrote:
Thank you for clarifying, Mark.
I do not yet have the knowledge to fix it, thus my comment. I do
appreciate the fix, though, because a number of my subscribers do
On 2/28/06, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I still don't understand the real issue here nor exactly how this would
be setup. It sounds like more time will be expended setting this up than it
would take to actually add a bunch of people to the non-member accept list.
It depends on who's
I see docs for the email interface for members of a
list (subscribe, unscubscribe, etc).
Are there equivalents for the administration functions
(add list, remove list, list admins, list lists, etc)?
The goal is to integrate a 3rd party application to
use Mailman without having to have a person
At 4:56 PM -0800 2006-02-23, Dave Crocker wrote:
From what I can tell, the Goodmail technology does not work
through a mailing
list. From what I can tell, limited its application to transaction mail will
keep this from being a problem.
I worked at AOL for over two years, as the
At 9:08 AM -0500 2006-02-24, Jonathan Dill wrote:
If you only have a few people on your mailing list, probably nothing,
but if you cross a certain threshhold--I'm guessing either number of
messages sent from you, or number of spam complaints--AOL just starts
rejecting your e-mail, and you
I have in my mm_cfg.py :
KNOWN_SPAMMERS = [('X-Spam-Status', 'Yes')]
But for some reason this is discarding lots of mail. Is there some way I
can turn up the debugging so I can see why these messages are being
discarded? Where do these discarded messages go?
Thanks
--
Joel Heenan
(I do not found this problem on the archives)
Hi,
I use spamassassin to filter spam. So I configured a rule in mailman
that detect
the string {Spam} in the subject of the email and then defer the email.
The problem is that mailman sent to owner of the list the email that is
spam with
the body of
Joel Heenan wrote:
I have in my mm_cfg.py :
KNOWN_SPAMMERS = [('X-Spam-Status', 'Yes')]
But for some reason this is discarding lots of mail. Is there some way I
can turn up the debugging so I can see why these messages are being
discarded? Where do these discarded messages go?
The messages are
Oliver Schulze L.wrote:
My question is:
how can I configure mailman to not sent the body of the email in the
notification
to the owner of the list?
I think we did the best we can with this last week in the thread you
started at
At 3:14 PM -0500 2006-02-27, Jeff Donsbach wrote:
Based on the lack of traffic to the mailman3-dev mailing list, is it a
safe assumption that Mailman3 development is stalled? (Please, devs,
don't take this as criticism. It is just a question).
No, I wouldn't say it's stalled.
At 3:27 PM -0800 2006-02-27, Tom Jennings wrote:
I realize that MM doesn't contain such a thing, I was hoping someone
would know of an external package that does this.
I was hoping I was just being an idiot and overlooking an obvious
package; that's the easiest thing to fix.
Actually I am new to this MGCP protocol.I am reading RFC 3435 for the
first time.
I am framing test cases also parallely.So kindly clarify my doubt.
Thanks,
Geetha.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:21:27 -0500, Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
What make/model of MGC? Also, do you know that it is
31 matches
Mail list logo
