Re: [Mailman-Users] large list = very slow network

2006-04-08 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 4/7/06, John Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been reading up on performance tweaking in the mailman FAQ and was wondering where I should concentrate my efforts to avoid the listserver saturating my line. I'm thinking a local dns cache on the box would be good, but have seen anything

Re: [Mailman-Users] non approval lists

2006-04-08 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 4/7/06, Brian Krusic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When creating a new list, is there a way to allow posting w/o membership or moderator approval? You should be able to change the default_nonmember_action, or somesuch, to 'accept'. -- - Patrick Bogen

Re: [Mailman-Users] non approval lists

2006-04-08 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* On 07/04/06 15:35 -0700, Brian Krusic wrote: | Hi, | | When creating a new list, is there a way to allow posting w/o | membership or moderator approval? | | An example would be a list named jobs where 1 time emails are | gotten from who ever and don't need to be approved for posting. You mean

[Mailman-Users] all posted messages discarded by incomingrunner

2006-04-08 Thread Jesse Sanford
Hi, This is kind of a followup to the Feb. 2006 thread about messages being discarded (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2006- February/049327.html). Where do I check ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER as per the previous post? Is that a runtime environment variable? I am using

[Mailman-Users] get members list

2006-04-08 Thread Daniel Carvalho
hi, When using the Mailman web-based administration, in the Membership list,the result is divided in several pages. There is one page for each letter, and if the list is too long, it is divided in ranges. The urls are like this: /mailman/admin/lista-info_campoaberto.pt/members?letter=gchunk=2

Re: [Mailman-Users] get members list

2006-04-08 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Carvalho wrote: Is there a way to get all the members of a mailing list in a single page? Sometimes this is more convenient. FAQ 3.62: How do I extract a list of my list's members (subscribers)?

Re: [Mailman-Users] get members list

2006-04-08 Thread Ed
Todd: Daniel Carvalho wrote: Is there a way to get all the members of a mailing list in a single page? Sometimes this is more convenient. FAQ 3.62: How do I extract a list of my list's members (subscribers)? Although that reply answers ONE of Daniel's question (which you do not cite), it does

[Mailman-Users] Other subscriptions page is not showing subscriptions for one particular list

2006-04-08 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I have several mailing lists on a virtual host proscientia.tuwien.ac.at (the server also hosts (www.)fam.tuwien.ac.at). All users are in two mailinglists, one (proscientia) for all persons, and another one (proscientia-LOCATION) depending

Re: [Mailman-Users] get members list

2006-04-08 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ed wrote: Todd: Daniel Carvalho wrote: Is there a way to get all the members of a mailing list in a single page? Sometimes this is more convenient. FAQ 3.62: How do I extract a list of my list's members (subscribers)? Although that reply

Re: [Mailman-Users] get members list

2006-04-08 Thread Ed
so it doesn't tend to get a chance to annoy me more than occasionally. :) YOU are lucky -:) !! Ed -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ:

Re: [Mailman-Users] all posted messages discarded by incomingrunner

2006-04-08 Thread Jesse Sanford
Okay, I figured it out myself. Just in case anyone else ever runs into this problem: On my system, spamassassin processes messages before they hit Mailman and marks them [SPAM] in the subject line. Some enterprising but novice users of mine had figured that if they entered [SPAM] into

Re: [Mailman-Users] get members list

2006-04-08 Thread John W. Baxter
On 4/8/06 7:35 PM, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so it doesn't tend to get a chance to annoy me more than occasionally. :) YOU are lucky -:) !! The continuing outcry against the old way was the reason the alphabetic way was tried. The old way produced pages of 30--I think--addresses (count