Thanks for your reply Brad.
Yeah, I read and reread the FAQ. Mailman has one of the best faq's I've
ever seen.
The percentage of our mail that AOL rejects is just huge - around 90% -
I was hoping that maybe someone could see something that we were doing
wrong. It'd be nice to get the
A few months ago, I set up mailman to manage bulk email of a
subscription-based newsletter. Only the admin can post. For some reason,
it's stopped working. All posts are moderated, so I usually send a message
to HYPERLINK
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] and I
get a response asking me to
On 3/22/07, lookaroundcornwall.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions as to where I should start looking?
If you have shell-level access to the server at mydomain.com (by the
way, please see RFC 2606 http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt,
about what domain names to use for examples.
To reiterate what Brad said, please see FAQ 3.42. It specifically
talks about this issue.
On 3/22/07, Dennis Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The percentage of our mail that AOL rejects is just huge - around 90% -
I was hoping that maybe someone could see something that we were doing
wrong.
Thanks Patrick, I'll start looking
It's getting through to the server - this from the exim log
2007-03-22 14:44:34 1HUOWo-0006sQ-9Z =
|/usr/local/home/mailman/mail/mailman owner announce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=system_aliases_all_local_domains T=alias_pipe
Oddly, I seem to be getting mail addressed
On 3/22/07, lookaroundcornwall.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's getting through to the server - this from the exim log
2007-03-22 14:44:34 1HUOWo-0006sQ-9Z =
|/usr/local/home/mailman/mail/mailman owner announce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=system_aliases_all_local_domains T=alias_pipe
This isn't
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm new to this list and to using Mailman. I am stepping in temporarily
in caring for the list I'm working with, and I have been asked to un-ban a
member. I don't know the reasons behind this banning, but since I have been
asked to
One likely cause is that Mailman's qrunners (IncomingRunner in
particular) are not running.
Spot on Mark, thanks. Next time we have a server outage I'll try and
remember that one. Is there any way to have it happen automatically?
Ken
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Patrick Bogenwrote:
On 3/22/07, lookaroundcornwall.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions as to where I should start looking?
If you have shell-level access to the server at mydomain.com (by the
way, please see RFC 2606 http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt,
about what domain names to
I'm resending this one. Can anyone help?
I have migrated a list from an old installation (2.1.5) to a new machine
(running 2.1.8). It appears that the move was successful since I can access
its page at:
http://mailman.domain.com/mailman/admin/listname
But it does not show up on the main
Quoting Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm resending this one. Can anyone help?
I have migrated a list from an old installation (2.1.5) to a new machine
(running 2.1.8). It appears that the move was successful since I can access
its page at:
Peter wrote:
I'm resending this one. Can anyone help?
I have migrated a list from an old installation (2.1.5) to a new machine
(running 2.1.8). It appears that the move was successful since I can access
its page at:
http://mailman.domain.com/mailman/admin/listname
But it does not show up on
Hi guys,
I am aggravated by a few idle list posters who consistently refuse to put in
a subject in their posts, and I would like to 'encourage' them to mend their
ways :)
I've tried putting a spam rule as per the faq, trapping subject containing
.*(no subject) but no workie.
The cases I'd like
Hi Mike,
It wasn't laziness, just an oversight, which I corrected in subsequent
posts. Sorry if I aggravated you.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.16/729 - Release Date: 21/03/2007
07:52
Le Jeudi 22 Mars 2007 13:14, Dragon a écrit :
Peter wrote:
I'm resending this one. Can anyone help?
I have migrated a list from an old installation (2.1.5) to a new machine
(running 2.1.8). It appears that the move was successful since I can
access its page at:
First off, please keep all replies on list, so that other folk can
give their input.
Check Mailman's 'vette' log to see why her posts are being held.
On 3/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked everything you said... I found her email, but it is listed under
Sender
JIC anyone was unclear, these problems are on _my_ lists, not on here :)
- Mike
On 22/03/07, Mike Maughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I am aggravated by a few idle list posters who consistently refuse to put
in a subject in their posts, and I would like to 'encourage' them to mend
I checked everything you said... I found her email, but it is listed under
Sender Filters in List of non-member addresses whose postings should be
automatically accepted. She is not listed in the subscribers at all, and the
list still won't accept her. Any further suggestions?
Thank you!
Greetings everyone,
Please know that I have tried to resolve this without posting, but I
have been unable to produce a solution from searching the web. I'm
incredibly frustrated!!! Please, if someone as an idea as to what is
going on, your input would be GREATLY apprecaited!!
I have the
On 3/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do I find the 'vette' log?
To get to the vette log, you need shell access to the server. Where
the log is actually located on the filesystem is dependent upon your
Distribution and how mailman was installed. One way to find it is to
Hi,
I'm getting some errors with a mailman cron job is running. I am using
mailman version 2.1.9 on an FC5 i386 box.
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/checkdbs
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/mailman/cron/checkdbs, line 203, in ?
main()
File /usr/lib/mailman/cron/checkdbs,
At 9:10 AM -0500 3/22/07, Dennis Morgan wrote:
The percentage of our mail that AOL rejects is just huge - around 90% -
I was hoping that maybe someone could see something that we were doing
wrong. It'd be nice to get the rejection rate down.
If you can show us complete copies of the
The esteemed Patrick Bogen has said:
To reiterate what Brad said, please see FAQ 3.42. It specifically
talks about this issue.
On 3/22/07, Dennis Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The percentage of our mail that AOL rejects is just huge - around 90% -
I was hoping that maybe someone could
lookaroundcornwall.com wrote:
Spot on Mark, thanks. Next time we have a server outage I'll try and
remember that one. Is there any way to have it happen automatically?
If you installed Mailman from source, there is a shell script
scripts/mailman in the Mailman's install directory which has
I posted earlier about problems with (no subject) postings to my lists,
not complaining about such to mailman-users, but I wasn't very clear in
what I said so my apologies to anyone who may have been offended.
To restate my problem and renew the request for help (if anyone is still
talking to
Mike Maughan wrote:
The cases I'd like to trap are:
1. empty subject
2. (no subject)
3. (no_subject)
Is there an easy way? Am I (as has been known on occasion :) missing
something obvious?
You can trap all 3 of the above cases with a header_filter_rules rule
with the regexp
Thanks again, Mark.
I've implemented the recommendations; now all I have to do is decipher your
regex :))
- Mike
On 23/03/07, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Maughan wrote:
The cases I'd like to trap are:
1. empty subject
2. (no subject)
3. (no_subject)
Is there
Mike Maughan wrote:
I've implemented the recommendations; now all I have to do is decipher your
regex :))
snip
$subject:\s*(\(no[_ ]subject\))?\s*$
Ooops! It's wrong. It should be
^subject:\s*(\(no[_ ]subject\))?\s*$
The original wouldn't match anything.
It says:
^ - the start of the line
On 23/03/07, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
^subject:\s*(\(no[_ ]subject\))?\s*$
Thanks for the fix the explanation. Do you know, that's the first time
I've actually understood a pattern search regex? Wunderbar! :)
--
Regards, Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me in plain english how to do this? I am not experienced in
programming. Thanks!
Go to the admin interface web pages and go to the Privacy
options...-Subscription rules page and look at the List of addresses
which are banned from membership in this
Lech Karol PawBaszek wrote:
What i would like is to have true lists only at the lowest level. But
be able to accept incoming mail at the highest level and not to worry
about accepting the same mail on the other lists (if it is not from my
company domainname).
I've tried
Patrick Bogen wrote:
On 3/21/07, Jennifer Oxelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is I can send the 'who' email command with the admin password
from /*any*/ email address (not even subscribed) and get the roster...
is this right? Wouldn't it be better if the 'who' command only worked
for
Peter wrote:
I accessed the list's admin page [I don't know how it worked with the password
I gave (it was the one I use for my other test lists)] and any links I choose
(like the privacy options; to make it advertised) does not use the correct
URL. It uses localhost.my.domain. I thought
Washakie Wyoming wrote:
I set up a virtual domain, and everything works with postfix alone. In
main.cf:
virtual_alias_domains = my.virt.domain
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
### Now, changes for Mailman:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases,
hash:/etc/mailman/aliases #if I
Le Jeudi 22 Mars 2007 14:01, Peter a écrit :
Le Jeudi 22 Mars 2007 13:14, Dragon a écrit :
Peter wrote:
I'm resending this one. Can anyone help?
I have migrated a list from an old installation (2.1.5) to a new machine
(running 2.1.8). It appears that the move was successful since I
Peter wrote:
I fixed the URL problem (I forgot the vital option: the URL) except I see that
for one link the URL did not change. In the archives More information about
this list is still the old one.
Any ideas why this may be?
Those links are built when the archive pages are created. If the
Adam Miller wrote:
I'm getting some errors with a mailman cron job is running. I am using
mailman version 2.1.9 on an FC5 i386 box.
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/checkdbs
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/mailman/cron/checkdbs, line 203, in ?
main()
File
hi there,
i want to edit part of the email that gets sent out as a daily digest...
specifically to remove the text at the top with all the list details about
how to send to the list, etc... i'm using this as an 'announcement only'
list and i don't want people to be able to access that
38 matches
Mail list logo
