Hello all! First, thanks to Mark for all your help.
Second, we use mailman 2.1.7 (novell rpm) on SLES10/OES2. The mailman
system has postix installed and we can send email via postfix with no
problems. I created a list and got the confirmation email. I joined
using a yahoo email account and our
I recently installed mailman on my Fedora 7 box and when I created a
test list and
tried to email a message to it, my message gets returned with the
following in it:
-
This is the mail system at host mail.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message
Chris Arnold wrote:
Second, we use mailman 2.1.7 (novell rpm) on SLES10/OES2. The mailman
system has postix installed and we can send email via postfix with no
problems.
FYI, there may eventually be problems sending to some recipients
because you appear to have a dynamic IP with DNS at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently installed mailman on my Fedora 7 box and when I created a
test list and
tried to email a message to it, my message gets returned with the
following in it:
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Command died with status 1:
/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Does this mean you do get the mail at our mytimewithgod domain email?
Yes, domain email is working and the system that has postfix is working
Then Mailman is getting the mail and sending it and the problem is with
delivery from Postfix to Yahoo.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
FYI, there may eventually be problems sending to some recipients
because you appear to have a dynamic IP with DNS at mydyndns.org.
Yes, we also have a smarthost (i forward mail to this smarthost and it
has a static ip and it will always be able
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
You don't have permission to access /pipermail/linuxmednews-announce
on this server.
Apache/2.2.6 (Fedora) Server at 7 2.5 1.3 x9 .1 24 (remove spaces and
x for the real IP) Port 80
I've checked the permission with check_perms and I did the chmod o-x
private thing but no
I also meant to put in the last post, the following when running
check_perms:
Warning: Private archive directory is other-executable (o+x).
This could allow other users on your system to read private
archives.
If you're on a shared multiuser system, you should consult the
Hi,
Is there a way to customize the rejection messages? Specifically, I want
to customize the rejection message that a non-member who posts to a list
that he is on the List of non-member addresses whose postings should be
automatically accepted
Currently they get this, if the message is
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Then Mailman is getting the mail and sending it and the problem is with
delivery from Postfix to Yahoo.
The mailman logs does not show anything about getting mail. Problems to
yahoo, comcast, gmail and other domains? In the last
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
This directory needs to be searchable by the web server or public
archives won't work. See the post at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-December/059288.html
for information about this and the 'pipermail' alias you need to make
public
Chris Arnold wrote:
I also meant to put in the last post, the following when running
check_perms:
Warning: Private archive directory is other-executable (o+x).
This could allow other users on your system to read private
archives.
If you're on a shared multiuser system, you
Charles Marcus wrote:
Is there a way to customize the rejection messages? Specifically, I want
to customize the rejection message that a non-member who posts to a list
that he is on the List of non-member addresses whose postings should be
automatically accepted
Currently they get this,
Thanks, Mark. I finally uninstalled, reinstalled, created mailman list,
chmod o-x the archives, ran check_perms -f, and it works. Not sure how
it got hosed, but I'm ok now.
Vicki
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Chris Arnold wrote:
Logs are attached (i am not fond of the addresses being indexed. So
Mark, if you can, please delete the attachments)
Too late :-(
In any case, the addresses there are all part of Message-IDs, and
robots will pick up the whole thing which is not a good address.
Also,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Mark. I finally uninstalled, reinstalled, created mailman list,
chmod o-x the archives, ran check_perms -f, and it works. Not sure how
it got hosed, but I'm ok now.
If you mean you ran chmod o-x on archives/private, see the Warning box
at
Mark Sapiro wrote:
If there aren't aliases, you couldn't send any mail TO mailman. You
have Postfix integration (MTA = 'Postfix') so your aliases are in
Mailman's data/aliases and data/virtual-mailman files.
So could this be why it is not working?
And i feel the need to say 2 domains
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
But they are the same box ...
No, they are different boxes
They look the same to me from the outside. So are you saying that there
is a local network behind the one externally visible IP.
That would explain a few things such as mailman is talking
Hallo Mark,
Op zondag 25 november 2007 schreef Mark Sapiro aan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MS http://www.list.org/mailman-install/node9.html.
This link cannot be found :(
MS It works for me, but there are mirrors at
MS http://mailman.sf.net/mailman-install/node9.html and
MS
Hi,
I know, I hate this kind of question, but, it's been 15 months since
2.1.19 was released, and I was just wondering if there was any kind of
tentative, planned guesstimated release date for 2.1.20...
Thanks...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Andrew Miller wrote:
We run Mailman 2.1.5 on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Server. Postfix 2.1.5 is the
SMTP server. A number of our subscribers who are sent digests are not
able to receive them. The digest messages are bouncing with the error
message:
Action: failed
Status: 5.6.1
Diagnostic-Code:
Charles Marcus wrote:
I know, I hate this kind of question, but, it's been 15 months since
2.1.19 was released, and I was just wondering if there was any kind of
tentative, planned guesstimated release date for 2.1.20...
If you mean 2.1.9 and 2.1.10, 2.1.10b0 is essentially ready to release.
Steve Campbell wrote:
I have set up a notification list for a department here. A member sent a
notice to the list and also included some other people in the CC fields.
snip
Is there some way I can allow that to go through without a complaint and
why would that be a problem to mailman?
Set
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
They look the same to me from the outside. So are you saying that there
is a local network behind the one externally visible IP.
That is correct a web server(postfix and mailman) and a mail server
(different servers).
snip
Postfix and mailman are
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Steve Campbell wrote:
I have set up a notification list for a department here. A member sent a
notice to the list and also included some other people in the CC fields.
snip
Is there some way I can allow that to go through without a complaint and
why
A strange thing happened recently, and I know the sender is going to ask
me about this.
I have set up a notification list for a department here. A member sent a
notice to the list and also included some other people in the CC fields.
Mailman complained about too many recipients. I'm not really
Mark Sapiro wrote:
They look the same to me from the outside. So are you saying that there
is a local network behind the one externally visible IP.
That is correct a web server(postfix and mailman) and a mail server
(different servers).
That would explain a few things such as mailman is
Mark Sapiro, on 12/3/2007 3:45 PM, said the following:
Charles Marcus wrote:
I know, I hate this kind of question, but, it's been 15 months since
2.1.19 was released, and I was just wondering if there was any kind of
tentative, planned guesstimated release date for 2.1.20...
If you mean
Charles Marcus wrote:
Mark Sapiro, on 12/3/2007 3:45 PM, said the following:
2.1.10b0 is essentially ready to release. There are a few packaging
glitches to work out due to the switch from Subversion to Bazaar for
version control, but it should be out very soon.
b0 meaning a beta?
Yes. b0
Rosi Bustamante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Our organization uses Salesforce.com for its database management,
and we'd like to make it work with Mailman, so people can sign up
for our newsletter on our website and their info gets automatically
entered into Salesforce.
Is such a
If all you want to change is the Message body is too big: 2236114
bytes with a limit of 256 KB line, you have to change that by
editing the definition of reason_notice in the MessageTooBig class in
Mailman/Handlers/Hold.py
Yes, that was part of it, thanks!
If you want to change the Hold
Mark Sapiro wrote:
OK. So i think the situation is you have one box with Mailman and
Postfix as the MTA. Outgoing mail from Mailman goes through this
Postfix. Incoming mail to the lists.mytimewithgod.net domain goes to a
different mailserver which relays it to Postfix on the Mailman/Postfix
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Have you ever looked in the admindb interface to see if there are held
posts?
I have but do not see where to check for held posts?
If you go to the admindb interface (either directly or via the Tend
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Have you ever looked in the admindb interface to see if there are held
posts?
I have but do not see where to check for held posts?
If you go to the admindb interface (either directly or via the Tend to
pending moderator requests link in the admin
Charles Marcus wrote:
For internal reasons, we only allow secure (https) traffic through our
firewall. The URL provided at the footer of a message being held (that
allows the sender to cancel it) is not a secure URL, so this link fails.
Is there a way to change this? I see how I can completely
Mark Sapiro wrote:
If you go to the admindb interface (either directly or via the Tend to
pending moderator requests link in the admin interface, it will
either show you the requests or tell you There are no pending
No pending requests
And what do you have for inet_interfaces?
All
Chris Arnold wrote:
OK, now i am at least getting mail returned :) (never thought i would be
so happy to have mail returned!). I remember this from the last time i
setup mailman in this environment; the error is
l[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail for
lists.mytimewithgod.net
On 12/3/2007, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
For internal reasons, we only allow secure (https) traffic through
our firewall. The URL provided at the footer of a message being
held (that allows the sender to cancel it) is not a secure URL, so
this link fails.
Hello,
I noticed a few days ago that incomming mail to a list would not always get
sent out. After trying to trace down the problem, i noticed the following
in the /var/log/mailman/error file corresponding to each missing message.
I've been unable to determine why the majority of messages go out
Teach your MTA to know that it is supposed to handle mail for those
addresses and deliver that to Mailman.
--
Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Chris Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
The machine is running Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper Drake), Mailman 2.1.5 installed
with apt-get, and Postfix. Any help would be appreciated.
-Jeff
Dec 03 18:09:53 2007 (4532) Uncaught runner exception: (104, 'Connection
reset by peer')
Dec 03 18:09:53 2007 (4532) Traceback (most
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
In postfix main.cf you need
virtual_alias_domains = lists.mytimewithgod.net
That did not work. I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host
192.168.x.x[192.168.x.x] said:
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
In postfix main.cf you need
virtual_alias_domains = lists.mytimewithgod.net
That did not work. I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host
192.168.x.x[192.168.x.x] said:
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't suppose there is a patch for the patch? That would be too easy.
It looks like after running unshunt, the same thing happens. I do not see
anything that appears to be a pattern among the shunted messages. Are there
any suggestions as to how I might fix this? I am not too familiar with
Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
I don't suppose there is a patch for the patch? That would be too easy.
You could try contacting the author via sourceforge
https://sourceforge.net/users/jhenstridge/.
You could find the code in Mailman/Handlers/spamd.py around line 122
that says:
try:
I am running Mailman 2.1.9 cp2 and every member on my list is getting the
montly reminder about their password. I've looked everywhere for the
component to turn that off. Can someone tell me how to disable that
feature?
Also, is there a way to find answers without having to be on a mailing
Michael Austin wrote:
I am running Mailman 2.1.9 cp2 and every member on my list is getting the
montly reminder about their password. I've looked everywhere for the
component to turn that off. Can someone tell me how to disable that
feature?
General Options-send_reminders = No.
Also, is
Hi!
Mailman qrunners eat a lot of memory on my site:
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
mailman 30263 0.0 0.6 80108 13520 ?S02:20 0:01
/usr/bin/python /usr/share/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=VirginRunner:0:1
mailman 30584 0.0 0.7 82252
Mark Sapiro wrote:
If lists.mytimewithgod.net is DEFAULT_URL_HOST (but I don't think it
is), run
bin/withlist -l -r fix_url mtwg-prayer
If not run
bin/withlist -l -r fix_url mtwg-prayer -u lists.mytimewithgod.net
Yep, i ran bin/withlist -l -r fix_url mtwg-prayer -u
Chris Arnold wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
As I told you off line, you don't (or didn't) have a
data/virtual-mailman file.
I think you must have looked in the wrong dir or something b/c there has
been virtual_mailman and .db file since i first ran genaliases.
Maybe I did, but see below:
You
Mark Sapiro wrote:
As I told you off line, you don't (or didn't) have a
data/virtual-mailman file.
I think you must have looked in the wrong dir or something b/c there has
been virtual_mailman and .db file since i first ran genaliases.
You need to be sure (fx_url) that your list
is in the
Grigory Batalov wrote:
I would like to know, is it possible to reduce qrunners memory usage and how?
There are 150 lists on the site and about 800 subscribers maximum.
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.056.htp.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:01:05 +0300, Grigory Batalov wrote:
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
...
mailman 30584 0.0 0.7 82252 15640 ?S02:20 0:01
/usr/bin/python /usr/share/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=IncomingRunner:5:6
mailman 30616
Is it possible to integrate Mailman with AD (preferably) or OpenLDAP? Anyone
tried doing this somewhere?
I'll have a number of users in AD which will form base for three systems.
Now there is talk of integrating email list functionality into the system,
and as I have some experience with Mailman
Martin S wrote:
Is it possible to integrate Mailman with AD (preferably) or OpenLDAP? Anyone
tried doing this somewhere?
I'll have a number of users in AD which will form base for three systems.
Now there is talk of integrating email list functionality into the system,
and as I have some
55 matches
Mail list logo
