Hello mailman guys..
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily newsletter..
I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want to use to promote
my website and mailing list .. can I create another mailman installation and
add these addresses to it and
Hello mailman guys..
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily newsletter..
I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want to use to promote
my website and mailing list .. can I create another mailman installation and
add these addresses to it and
Hello,
2008/1/24, Khalil Abbas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello mailman guys..
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily
newsletter.. I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want to
use to promote my website and mailing list .. can I create another
Hi all,
i've been using mailman-2.1.9 about a year now without problems.
I've set up a new mail server (postfix) and installed mailman again.
I've succesfully created a new list called mylist.
But, if i try to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] postfix replies that
this user does not exist:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I don't know why. If you have something like the following for your
mailman router
mailman_router:
driver = accept
domains = +mm_domains
require_files = MAILMAN_HOME/lists/$local_part/config.pck
local_part_suffix_optional
local_part_suffix =
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Khalil Abbas wrote:
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily
newsletter.. I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I
want to use to promote my website and mailing list ..
Not what you want to hear, but -even-if- 100%
Thanks for all the help guys! Embarrassingly, it was in fact a very
stupid configuration error. I completely forgot we used a mirror domain
for mailman (so it doesn't conflict with main virtual domain in postfix)
and a few weeks ago I made all domains redirect to the main domain in
apache
Yes, the other lists are working.
I can see some of these aliases in virtual-mailman and virtual-mailman.db --
but there is a warning not to edit these files. Actually, one functioning
list isn't in either of these files, which makes me think there is a
separate aliases file elsewhere...
OK,
Dennis Putnam wrote:
At 06:10 PM 1/21/2008, you wrote:
Somewhere, there is another test/backup/incompletely deleted/whatever
Mailman installation that is sending these. Check the Received: headers
of the message to see at which server it originates and then
I'm not sure what you mean by
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
2008/1/24, Khalil Abbas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello mailman guys..
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily
newsletter.. I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want
to use to promote my website and mailing list ..
AlxFrag wrote:
Hi all,
i've been using mailman-2.1.9 about a year now without problems.
I've set up a new mail server (postfix) and installed mailman again.
I've succesfully created a new list called mylist.
But, if i try to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] postfix replies that
Joakim Nömell wrote:
If I change -owner to -own in the mm router in my exim.conf-file and
change the above in MailList.py I got this log in exim:
2008-01-24 14:35:17 1JI2Ef-00011f-7q = [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=localhost
[127.0.0.1] P=esmtps X=TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32 S=856
[EMAIL
I agree, and it's not harsh enough.
My first reaction to this was Oh-My-God.
My second reaction was to think that we needed an agreement among Mailman list
users that Mailman not be used for spam. Then I realized that that would only
inconvenience legit Mailman users and spammers would not
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:31:48 -0800
From: Allan Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I suppose that the best response is to simply ignore requests such as
this which so obviously is from a spammer.
I disagree. They shouldn't be ignored. They should be denounced.
Previous posters covered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 24, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Allan Hansen wrote:
I agree, and it's not harsh enough.
My first reaction to this was Oh-My-God.
My second reaction was to think that we needed an agreement among
Mailman list users that Mailman not be used for
Matthew Farr wrote:
Yes, the other lists are working.
I can see some of these aliases in virtual-mailman and virtual-mailman.db --
but there is a warning not to edit these files. Actually, one functioning
list isn't in either of these files, which makes me think there is a
separate aliases
On 1/24/08, Barry Warsaw wrote:
However, I think it's perfectly appropriate to denounce spammers, and
refuse to help them.
Speaking only for myself, if I discover that someone has actively
used Mailman to further their illegal and/or immoral spamming
activities, then I will take any and
Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got .. this is what
I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have no idea that this is
spamming.. all I know about spamming is those who send you repeatedly every
once in a while, and all I wanna do is send a simple invite
From: Khalil Abbas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:41:14 +
Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got .. this
is what I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have no
idea that this is spamming.. all I know about spamming is those
Hello again,
2008/1/25, Cyndi Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Khalil Abbas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:41:14 +
Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got .. this
is what I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have no
20 matches
Mail list logo
