[Mailman-Users] 'gb2312' codec can't decode bytes in position 0-1: illegal multibyte sequence

2008-04-17 Thread Fan Liu
Hi all, I'm using Mailman 2.1.9 with python 2.4 and debian lenny. Since there're posts encoded with 'gb2312', which can be decoded fine in mutt. However, the archived mails, by pipermail, was not diplayed well in webpages. I searched the mailman-users list, and find the same problem posted

Re: [Mailman-Users] Again on HTML emails

2008-04-17 Thread Giulio Troccoli
On Gio, 17 Aprile 2008 1:56 am, Cyndi Norwitz wrote: Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:54:27 +0100 (BST) From: Giulio Troccoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] I need to send HTML email, or better I need to be able to do so. I've read a lot of posts that say how to prevent HTML emails to be sent, but I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need capability of link to archived messages

2008-04-17 Thread Darren G Pifer
Hi Mark, On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:46 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: Darren G Pifer wrote: The owner of the list wanted to know, as I do, is it possible to get the e-mail of the message but the message contain an embedded URL to the stored archive instead an e-mail message with the log?

[Mailman-Users] Only One List Is Not Working

2008-04-17 Thread Carlos Williams
I have several mailman list on my Postfix server and all work as far as I know except for my most important one which is called everyone at example.com. This list goes out to everyone who has an email account on my Postfix server. I created some test lists today and just to make sure that mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] 'gb2312' codec can't decode bytes in position 0-1:illegal multibyte sequence

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Fan Liu The resolution suggested to intall cjkcodecs, which is provided by python2.4 now, and add add_language('zh_CN', _('Chinese (China)'), 'gb2312') in Defaults.py (as referred to an earlier post http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-i18n/2003-September/000976.html). Then I run arch

Re: [Mailman-Users] Only One List Is Not Working

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Carlos Williams wrote: Are there any tips you guys can suggest I do for troubleshooting or perhaps providing some information that could help me understand why simply one of my lists is not working? See http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.076.htp -- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL

[Mailman-Users] Upgrade from 2.1.5 to 2.1.9

2008-04-17 Thread Moss, Patricia
I could not find much documentation on upgrading from mailman version 2.1.5 to version 2.1.9. I want to make sure that it is as simple as backing up my current install then run 'configure' and 'make install'. The new will overwrite the old and convert what needs to be converted; would this be a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email response very slow using Mailman and sendmail

2008-04-17 Thread Patil, Manjiri S
Hi Hank and mark , First of all thanks a lot for your detailed log explanation. I send new message to this list today morning at 9:01AM and I received it arrived at 10:02 AM. But some users havn't received it after 2hours. After searching through logs I have come up with following. Also I see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Again on HTML emails

2008-04-17 Thread Brad Knowles
Giulio Troccoli wrote: Now my problem is how do I send proper HTML formatted emails with a script? If anybody is willing to help me with that please email me, I don't want to spam the list with OT emails. I'd suggest getting a MIME CLI toolkit that you can use. Going to freshmeat.net and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need capability of link to archived messages

2008-04-17 Thread Brad Knowles
Darren G Pifer wrote: The issue was no such much the moderator had to approve the message because of the size but the fact that the e-mail messages to the list are rather large. It took about 10 munites to get my Evolution client to read the entire message. Mailman is probably not the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Upgrade from 2.1.5 to 2.1.9

2008-04-17 Thread Dragon
Moss, Patricia wrote: I could not find much documentation on upgrading from mailman version 2.1.5 to version 2.1.9. I want to make sure that it is as simple as backing up my current install then run 'configure' and 'make install'. The new will overwrite the old and convert what needs to be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email response very slow using Mailman and sendmail

2008-04-17 Thread Brad Knowles
Patil, Manjiri S wrote: I do see that SENDAMAIL is trying to send messages only to bunch of people which varies from 10 to 50 at time. Also how do I tune up SENDMAIL with number of recipients to process at one time? Ten to fifty users is actually quite a lot. You're not likely to get too

Re: [Mailman-Users] Third party unsubscribe request

2008-04-17 Thread Dave Hillam
On Wednesday, April 16, 2008, 5:56:44 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: Dave Hillam wrote: But - other than tell him to ignore the unsubscribe request, what can I do as listadmin in these circumstances? There's not much you can do. You might be able to go through your logs and get some information

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need capability of link to archived messages

2008-04-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Darren G Pifer writes: The issue was no such much the moderator had to approve the message because of the size but the fact that the e-mail messages to the list are rather large. This stripping would be almost trivial except that it's difficult to predict what the URL would be (archiving

Re: [Mailman-Users] Third party unsubscribe request

2008-04-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Dave Hillam writes: I reckon that it's more of a presentation issue - why tell people to contact the listadmin, if there's nothing that can be done? On the other hand, it gives a point of contact/reassurance for list members who may get confused/upset at this, I suppose. That's the main

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email response very slow using Mailman and sendmail

2008-04-17 Thread Hank van Cleef
The esteemed Patil, Manjiri S has said: Hi Hank and mark , (snipping for brevity) I do see that SENDAMAIL is trying to send messages only to bunch of people which varies from 10 to 50 at time. Also how do I tune up SENDMAIL with number of recipients to process at one time? Apr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need capability of link to archived messages

2008-04-17 Thread Darren G Pifer
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 02:45 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Darren G Pifer writes: The issue was no such much the moderator had to approve the message because of the size but the fact that the e-mail messages to the list are rather large. This stripping would be almost trivial

Re: [Mailman-Users] Again on HTML emails

2008-04-17 Thread Giulio Troccoli
Brad Knowles wrote: Giulio Troccoli wrote: Now my problem is how do I send proper HTML formatted emails with a script? If anybody is willing to help me with that please email me, I don't want to spam the list with OT emails. I'd suggest getting a MIME CLI toolkit that you can use. Going to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need capability of link to archived messages

2008-04-17 Thread Brad Knowles
Darren G Pifer wrote: I don't have time myself to work something up so I am dependent on others for this. If you can do this, this will help us out greatly and I suppose others who could use this functionality. As it currently exists, Mailman can't do this because the archiving function

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need capability of link to archived messages

2008-04-17 Thread Jonathan Dill
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Darren G Pifer wrote: We have a list that we use for keeping backup logs and sometimes these logs get rather large. The list is moderated and sometimes the size of the message goes beyond the Maximum length in KB of message body which requires approval.

[Mailman-Users] question about config_list

2008-04-17 Thread charlie derr
Hi, I'm trying to create a template for semi-automatic list creation, and while 'config_list -o' will dump out a floating point number for bounce_score_threshold correctly, when I try to use this generated config file with 'config_list -i' somehow the floating point value gets

[Mailman-Users] Security issues and code releases ... OO example

2008-04-17 Thread VLM TechSubs
Greetings everyone, First, I do not wish to trigger another round of flames, as we had here yesterday WRT this topic. Second, and by coincidence from my perspective, the Open Office team just issued a post that some here might find informative WRT this topic. Third, I am not a developer. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Upgrade from 2.1.5 to 2.1.9

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Moss, Patricia wrote: I could not find much documentation on upgrading from mailman version 2.1.5 to version 2.1.9. I want to make sure that it is as simple as backing up my current install then run 'configure' and 'make install'. The new will overwrite the old and convert what needs to be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Only One List Is Not Working

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Carlos Williams wrote: So now I am really at a loss on how to resolve this. The only thing I can think of is to delete the everyone and re-create it in mailman and re-subscibe everyone to it but I hate not understanding something and taking the easy way out. Not to mention who knows if that will

Re: [Mailman-Users] Only One List Is Not Working

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Carlos Williams wrote: I deleted the everyone list and recreated it with myself as the admin. It creates fine. I then start with 3 users (my IT staff) and subscribe them and all goes well. I then place a test email to everyone and all 3 users including myself get the email sent to everyone. I

[Mailman-Users] Infinite moderation loop for one list

2008-04-17 Thread Ricardo Ramirez
Hello, I am the owner of several mailman lists and I have set up very stringent moderation filters in an effort to curb spam. The filters work as expected except for one list in particular. The list is owned by itself and me. It is configured to send the owner notice of a pending moderation

Re: [Mailman-Users] Infinite moderation loop for one list

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ricardo Ramirez wrote: I am the owner of several mailman lists and I have set up very stringent moderation filters in an effort to curb spam. The filters work as expected except for one list in particular. The list is owned by itself and me. No list should ever be owned by itself. It is