I want to input my own text, when i reject mail. when i put it into If you
reject this post,
please explain (optional) box, it's display like message below:
Your request to the Gender mailing list
Posting of your message titled Hi
has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator
--On 8. Juli 2008 12:01:42 -0700 Knabe, Troy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently use ldap groups for mail lists, and I am wanting to migrate
them to Mailman. I have somewhere around 1000 lists, and want to be able
to script list creation. Is there a way to run newlist and take it's
input
Thanks for your comments, Brad.
I've contacted a couple of companies on the Hosting Services list, as the
Consultancy list is actually empty. Everything else everybody's told me seems
like MailMan will do the job, although the Python aspect (or my complete lack
of knowledge of it) could be a
This is my mm_cfg.py but it doesn't appear that mailman is utilizing it. I had
to change my DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST in Defaults.py in order for it to take affect
on install, and now I am trying to set the DEFAULT_MSG_FOOTER and it is not
using this one. Any insights?
cat mm_cfg.py
# -*- python
Mak Dara wrote:
I want to input my own text, when i reject mail. when i put it into If you
reject this post,
please explain (optional) box, it's display like message below:
Your request to the Gender mailing list
Posting of your message titled Hi
has been rejected by the list moderator.
Knabe, Troy wrote:
This is my mm_cfg.py but it doesn't appear that mailman is utilizing it. I
had to change my DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST in Defaults.py in order for it to take
affect on install, and now I am trying to set the DEFAULT_MSG_FOOTER and it is
not using this one. Any insights?
See
I run a Cobalt RAQ550 server with about 125 Mailman lists on it. On
several occasions, one of the lists has had its membership roster set
back to one from the past. It turns out I had a defective UPS, and I
would guess that it happened when there was a power glitch and some
operation got
Thanks as always for your clear and accurate answer. You amaze me
with your work in development, and support, your knowledge, your
patience etc...
Thanks!
Dave
At 04:13 PM 7/9/2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
David Andrews wrote:
I run a Cobalt RAQ550 server with about 125 Mailman lists on it.
As for DEFAULT_MSG_FOOTER, that is the default for lists created after
you made the change. It has no effect on exisitng lists. (more below)
I understand that, but it didn't seem to work that way, I will test it again.
So here is my snip of mm_cfg.py, my concern is that my mailhost is
My messages sent to lists are being placed in the mailq and taking 5-15 minutes
to be delivered. I use Sophos's PureMessage for Spam/Anti-virus scanning so
part of sendmail config hands the message off to a milter, but then it is being
placed in the mailq instead of delivering the message. Is
Knabe, Troy wrote:
As for DEFAULT_MSG_FOOTER, that is the default for lists created after
you made the change. It has no effect on exisitng lists. (more below)
I understand that, but it didn't seem to work that way, I will test it again.
So here is my snip of mm_cfg.py, my concern is that my
Knabe, Troy wrote:
My messages sent to lists are being placed in the mailq and taking 5-15
minutes to be delivered. I use Sophos's PureMessage for Spam/Anti-virus
scanning so part of sendmail config hands the message off to a milter, but
then it is being placed in the mailq instead of
Brad Knowles wrote:
Correct. The Mailman developers feel that forcing all
replies to go back to the list causes much more harm than
good.
For a real-world example: We run several thousand lists here
at our university (not all in Mailman) and we had a class list
set up with replies go to
Knabe, Troy wrote:
My messages sent to lists are being placed in the mailq and taking 5-15
minutes to be delivered. I use Sophos's PureMessage for Spam/Anti-virus
scanning so part of sendmail config hands the message off to a milter,
but then it is being placed in the mailq instead of
Sigh...this is my ISP's response to my request. At least they did take it
seriously and consider it (the option is Mark's suggestion of a severe
limit on numbers of subscribers listowners could add per
day/week/whatever).
We have decided that we are not going to implement this option on our
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Cyndi Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, I disagree. As do all the other mailing list providers that I'm
aware of.
Not me. If I were setting up a Mailman system that allowed un-trusted
users to admin lists, then I would remove the bulk-subscription
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:54:59 -0400
From: Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Cyndi Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, I disagree. As do all the other mailing list providers that I'm
aware of.
Not me. If I were setting up a Mailman
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Cyndi Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming you ran a system with users you didn't know well enough to judge,
what sorts of options would you consider implementing? If any...
Excellent question. I would have to think, given the prevalence and
persistence
I'll be begin by saying I greatly appreciate those who will take the time
to provide me with some guidance and assistance.
BACKGROUND
Our school has access to a Mailman (version 2.1.9.cp2) List Server. We
just want to create a Master email list to send announcements out to
parents and students.
Cyndi Norwitz writes:
I appreciate your input. I am curious what other server owners/
ISP's do. From the talk on this list, it would seem that any
restriction on what listowners can do is considered a violation.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call it a violation, but I would not
want
awesome!!! It worked. Thanks so much Jason and everyone.
It was exactly same issue that you identified. Appreciate great help from
Jason, Mouss and team.
Following changes were done in mailman configuration to make it work.
--
REMOVE_DKIM_HEADER = YES in defaults.py
SMTPPORT=587
21 matches
Mail list logo
