faisal anif wrote:
>
>I have the following settings:
>
>bounce_score_threshold: 2.0
>bounce_info_stale_after: 7
>bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings: 0 - for immediate removal
>bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings_interval: 7
>
>then I notice that the addresses that have delivery disabled for bounce r
hi,
I have the following settings:
bounce_score_threshold: 2.0
bounce_info_stale_after: 7
bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings: 0 - for immediate removal
bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings_interval: 7
then I notice that the addresses that have delivery disabled for bounce reason
is still in the
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 17:55 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
> By interactive, I mean that SpamAssassin (or SpamBayes) would be
> executed before we give the sender a "250 Ok" for the message. That
> would allow us to reject stuff that gets a high spam score instead of
> dropping it.
Oh, Ok. Thanks
Paul wrote:
>I tried yesterday unsuccessfully from upgrade mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.6
>on Centos 4 to the latest 2.1.11 from sourceforge.
>
>When I ran "configure" it said I needed to install Python from source or
>install the Python-devel package, so I installed the python-devel.
>
># yum -y inst
on 12/20/08 2:35 PM, Lindsay Haisley said:
What do you mean by this. Can shell account users not interactively use
spamc or spamassassin from a command prompt?
By interactive, I mean that SpamAssassin (or SpamBayes) would be
executed before we give the sender a "250 Ok" for the message. Tha
I tried yesterday unsuccessfully from upgrade mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.6
on Centos 4 to the latest 2.1.11 from sourceforge.
When I ran "configure" it said I needed to install Python from source or
install the Python-devel package, so I installed the python-devel.
# yum -y install python-devel
Th
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> mailmanctl stop should have stopped the last instance started, but yes,
>> it isn't going to stop everything in this situation.
>
>Would a killall type of functionality be contraindicated in mailmanctl
>stop?
It would have to
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> mailmanctl stop should have stopped the last instance started, but yes,
> it isn't going to stop everything in this situation.
Would a killall type of functionality be contraindicated in mailmanctl
stop?
> >The files referenced were nowhere to be foun
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 14:24 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
> I'd also
> like to make sure that SpamAssassin is set up to run interactively.
What do you mean by this. Can shell account users not interactively use
spamc or spamassassin from a command prompt?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "The differenc
on 12/20/08 1:54 PM, Lindsay Haisley said:
Well I'm probably not doing as effective a job of pre-filtering as you
are at UT.
And what we're doing for python.org and ntp.org can't match those
numbers, either.
For ntp.org, we do pretty much the same as you -- use a few RBLs
up-front, and the
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> >I stated in the original post that LO was also subbed.
>>
>>
>> Sorry. I missed that. I was more focussed on your multiple qrunners (my
>> diagnosis) issue, and then I skipped ahead.
>>
>> Have you resolved the multiple qrunn
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 13:13 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Unfortunately, milters are not widely supported outside of modern
> versions of sendmail and postfix.
Courier's maildrop implements a perl-like structured scripting language
that's about as flexible as anything I'm aware of for this purpose
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >I stated in the original post that LO was also subbed.
>
>
> Sorry. I missed that. I was more focussed on your multiple qrunners (my
> diagnosis) issue, and then I skipped ahead.
>
> Have you resolved the multiple qrunners?
Yes, with work. there mu
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>I stated in the original post that LO was also subbed.
Sorry. I missed that. I was more focussed on your multiple qrunners (my
diagnosis) issue, and then I skipped ahead.
Have you resolved the multiple qrunners?
>LO is getting
>everything (requests, other list traffic
on 12/20/08 10:41 AM, Lindsay Haisley said:
A "milter" is just an MTA component/plugin that reflects user-space
(outside the MTA) decisions on spam/viruses back to the SMTP dialog so
that a receiving server can reject an email for cause without generating
a backscatter email to the envelope send
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> You still haven't explicitly answered the question. Is the "address at
> another domain, on another box, past a different segment" a member of
> the list or is it just the owner. If it is the owner, but not a list
> member, exactly what messages is it not
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
>> Thanks for clarifying, but it's still not clear. Do you mean the
>> list-ow...@domain.name address is subbed to the list, or the address to which
>> list-owner points is on the list?
>
>Good point. LO in this case is jus
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>>Dec 20 01:35:17 2008 (633) Skipping and preserving unparseable message:
>>1229758515.53407+f7dd7f3e72a65eb8764166694ac958f0d9335dcf
>
>
>This may be an unparseable message. It got preserved for analysis in
>qfiles/shunt (2.1.10) or qfiles/bad (2.1.11)
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying, but it's still not clear. Do you mean the
> list-ow...@domain.name address is subbed to the list, or the address to which
> list-owner points is on the list?
Good point. LO in this case is just an address at another domain,
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
>I do
>have one request. When you reply to one of my posts on this list,
>please don't CC me, or reply to me and CC the list. I'm on the list so
>I get a copy of everything you post. I don't need two of them :-)
People reply-all to list posts for various reasons. One v
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>Looking in logs/smtp, I see no sign of the messages from owner that are
>clearly in the archives! In logs/error, I see that when the machine came
>up there are intermittent errors that look like:
>
>Dec 20 01:35:17 2008 (633) Uncaught runner exception: [Errno 2] No such
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 12:06 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 11:30 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> > > listowner address sends a "Maintenance Over" message to a bunch of
> > > machines/lists.
> >
> > It's not coming from Mailma
Since it's apparently not clear: this is a long existing and well behaved
mailman installation prior to today.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin_at_mfn.org
0xpgp_key_mgmt_is_broken-dont_bother
"Never belong to any party, always oppose privileged classes and public
plunderers, never lack sympat
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 11:30 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> > listowner address sends a "Maintenance Over" message to a bunch of
> > machines/lists.
>
> It's not coming from Mailman. Are your list/list-owner addresses
> possibly referenced in a boot
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 11:30 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> listowner address sends a "Maintenance Over" message to a bunch of
> machines/lists.
It's not coming from Mailman. Are your list/list-owner addresses
possibly referenced in a boot script?
> On one machine with 4 lists, owneraddress post
Good Morning,
Last night our colo came down for routine maintenace, when
everything came back up, I noticed a *really* strange issue:
listowner address sends a "Maintenance Over" message to a bunch of
machines/lists.
On one machine with 4 lists, owneraddress posting shows up in archive
Steven, J.A., others,
Thank's for some good ideas re. spam management implementation. I do
have one request. When you reply to one of my posts on this list,
please don't CC me, or reply to me and CC the list. I'm on the list so
I get a copy of everything you post. I don't need two of them :-)
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 19:35 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Courier doesn't need milters. Maildrop can be run in what's called
> > "embedded mode" which is effectively the same thing.
> x`
> No, it's not the same, not for the purpose of deciding whether
> *Courier* needs milters.
A "milte
Lindsay Haisley writes:
> Courier doesn't need milters. Maildrop can be run in what's called
> "embedded mode" which is effectively the same thing.
No, it's not the same, not for the purpose of deciding whether
*Courier* needs milters. *You* don't need milters because you don't
mind eating th
29 matches
Mail list logo
