Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been caught
by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did not get
caught by the bounce system?
You send them to me, but I need
Brad Knowles wrote:
on 2/13/09 1:12 PM, Dragos Leahu said:
1. Which is the best way to upgrade Mailman to a newer version (the
latest if possible) without taking any risk?
All upgrades carry a certain measure of risk. If you want absolute zero
risk, then pull the power cord, toss the
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2004-October/017343.html
for more on this. There is a patch attached to that post which is
against an older (2.1.5 I think) base which you could probably apply
to 2.1.12 and then configure and make to match your existing
installation.
Could
Fil wrote:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2004-October/017343.html
for more on this. There is a patch attached to that post which is
against an older (2.1.5 I think) base which you could probably apply
to 2.1.12 and then configure and make to match your existing
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by the bounce system?
I'm sorry .. I forgot to say: per list .. I meant : is there a way to set
mailman to make each list on the same server to send using external mail
servers??
for example : I have 5 lists, list1,list2,list3,list4,list5, can mailman make:
list1 send to mail.external-server1.com
list2 send to
on 2/14/09 6:11 PM, Khalil Abbas said:
I'm sorry .. I forgot to say: per list .. I meant : is there a way to
set mailman to make each list on the same server to send using
external mail servers??
On a per-list basis? No, not without making source code modifications.
On this issue, you get
are you guys gonna be real pals and do this modification to the source code
soon? This would be a great addition to mailman's many great features - I hope
this sucking up would work :) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:39:02 -0600
From: b...@shub-internet.org To: khillo...@hotmail.com CC:
Khalil Abbas wrote:
I'm sorry .. I forgot to say: per list .. I meant : is there a way to set
mailman to make each list on the same server to send using external mail
servers??
for example : I have 5 lists, list1,list2,list3,list4,list5, can mailman make:
list1 send to
Khalil Abbas wrote:
are you guys gonna be real pals and do this modification to the source code
soon? This would be a great addition to mailman's many great features - I hope
this sucking up would work :)
It won't work. The only thing that would work is a strong argument that
this
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by
*
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by
On 02/14/2009 07:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
That question hinges on whether or not the bounce should be
considered a permanent or a temporary failure. The bounce itself says
This is a permanent error.
Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the
bounce is speaking of
Grant Taylor wrote:
P.S. I find it interesting that the bounce is eluding to the amount of
space remaining in the account. This is (in my experience) extremely
unusual.
As I read the bounce, it says
Sorry, your intended recipient has too much mail stored
in his mailbox.
Your message
On 02/14/2009 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
and I interpret that to mean that even though the user is over quota,
the MTA will accept a 1 KB message to allow you to try to notify
the user of the problem, not that the user is 1 KB below quota.
*nod*
Hopefully there is a limit to how far over
Dear Sir,
I have met some difficulties when checking installation. I have google
the issue, and take necessary measurement that I know, but still got the
problem.
How can I fix the problem? Any advice and suggestion is welcomed. Thanks
in advance.
$ bin/check_perms
Traceback (most recent call
I know the mmdsr program is an unsupported application, but I am hoping
somebody here can help me out. I have not been able to find any answers
via Google or the mailing list archives. I have set up all of the
parameters, but the program never finishes running. When I run it from
the command
I have started getting the following error message in my log files. It
appears to be when Mailman receives a bounce for a non-member.
Feb 13 21:31:25 2009 qrunner(527): Traceback (most recent call last):
Feb 13 21:31:25 2009 qrunner(527): File
/Applications/mailman/bin/qrunner, line 278,
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today.
The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been
caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did
not get caught by the
on 2/14/09 10:49 AM, Jeff Grossman said:
I know the mmdsr program is an unsupported application, but I am hoping
somebody here can help me out.
I'm the original author of mmdsr (now that it's been checked into source
control, Mark has been the last person to make any changes to it), but
on 2/14/09 7:32 PM, Grant Taylor said:
Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the
bounce is speaking of is on the SMTP level, thus the sending server
should not try to send this given message again. I think it is a flaw
to extend this SMTP meaning up to actual
21 matches
Mail list logo
