On 07/18/2014 11:20 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
>
> When I run the other patches, it'd report something like "Hunk #1
> succeed at 12 (offset -1 lines).", compared to when I ran your patch (as
> directed above) it only spits out "patching file Mailman/Mailbox.py"
> with no indication whether it was s
Mark,
One last question, as I'm a bit of novice when it comes to the "patch"
command.
When I run the other patches, it'd report something like "Hunk #1 succeed
at 12 (offset -1 lines).", compared to when I ran your patch (as directed
above) it only spits out "patching file Mailman/Mailbox.py" wit
On 07/18/2014 10:59 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I hate to be a pest.
>
> 1. I saved your patch in "/usr/src"
>
> 2. I enter the folder "/usr/src/mailman-2.1.18-1"
>
> 3. I run "patch -p1 < ../Mailbox.py.patch"
>
> 4. The following message is presented:
>
> (Stripping trailing CRs fro
Mark,
I hate to be a pest.
1. I saved your patch in "/usr/src"
2. I enter the folder "/usr/src/mailman-2.1.18-1"
3. I run "patch -p1 < ../Mailbox.py.patch"
4. The following message is presented:
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the
On 07/18/2014 10:40 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
>
> So if I understand correctly, based on your patch, I apply things in the
> following order:
>
> 1. modinc.patch
> 2. mhonarc.patch
> 3. Mailbox.py.patch
>
> *** the latter patch addressing what the "mhonarc" patch didn't due to
> Mailman changes t
Mark,
So if I understand correctly, based on your patch, I apply things in the
following order:
1. modinc.patch
2. mhonarc.patch
3. Mailbox.py.patch
*** the latter patch addressing what the "mhonarc" patch didn't due to
Mailman changes that were made post-patch release. ***
Best Regards,
Peter
On 07/18/2014 12:10 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
>
> The only error that remains when applying the "mhonarc" patch is:
>
> Hulk #2 FAILED at 106.
> 1 out of 2 hulks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Mailbox.py.rej
The problem with the patch is that the file it is based on ended at the
point
THANK YOU! Worked like a charm. I owe you a beer, at least. :)
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 08:28 AM, Pablo Montepagano wrote:
>>
>> When confirmations are sent, the FROM header does not follow this
>> pattern "Mailman ", it just has
>> the addres, i.e, "li
Mark,
First off, to clarify, yes we're using version 2.1.18-1.
Next, the "Version.py" issue has been resolved. I had forgotten to apply
the "modinc" prerequisite patch.
The only error that remains when applying the "mhonarc" patch is:
Hulk #2 FAILED at 106.
1 out of 2 hulks FAILED -- saving rej
