/ Having a problem with the Welcome email text file.
/
Is the recipient using Outlook with the Remove extra line breaks in plain text
messages box checked?
Thanks for the responses.
I'm running FireFox Thunderbird that doesn't appear to have that type of
setting, if it does, doesn't have an
Hi
I know that this has been going around the internet lately. I've done
the usual web search. Not really found anything that might work for
me. I've installed a CentOS 7 web server. I'm building a site around
it. Mailman is my list management software. I've used it for more
than ten
Hi
Further to the last one. I did reinstall from the CentOS RPM. Some
things started to work but the list admin page stills gives me the
same error. I have tried to build from source but that fails
miserably. This is the first time that I've installed Mailman and so
I'm not sure what I've
On 08/15/2014 03:34 PM, David Law wrote:
Seems the rules used on the List-specific text prepended to
new-subscriber welcome message box are also used on the contents of
what you add to Welcome email text file page.
That is correct. Both the welcome_msg text and the Welcome email text
file
On 08/16/2014 04:18 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I'm not sure what I've missed. /var/log/mailman/error shows...
Aug 16 07:12:25 2014 admin(17943):
admin(17943): [- Mailman Version: 2.1.15 -]
admin(17943): [- Traceback --]
On Saturday 16 August 2014 09:16:44 Mark Sapiro wrote:
This may be a file or a symlink to something like
/var/lib/mailman/data/adm.pw. In any case, the target needs to be
group mailman and mode 0640.
Running
sudo bin/check_perms -f
should fix this.
Ah... That was the one. I thought
S I finally decide to sit down and try to figure out why
http://www.team.net/mailman/admin
and http://autox.team.net/mailman/admin return different results, even though
it is the same machine.
Checking on some list configs, I do bin/config_list -o - listname and get
this from one list,
but
As an added bit of info, the first 7 of 67 lists, in alphabetical order all
have this
problem. Maybe I just need to reinstall 2.1.18-1
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
On 08/16/2014 03:43 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
S I finally decide to sit down and try to figure out why
http://www.team.net/mailman/admin
and http://autox.team.net/mailman/admin return different results, even
though it is the same machine.
See the FAQ at http://wiki.list.org/x/lYA9.
There is an issue with the list's data_version attribute vs.
Mailman.Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION. When the from_is_list and other new
attributes were added, Mailman.Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION was incremented to
make it greater than the list's data_version attribute which in turn will cause
On 08/16/2014 07:20 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
The problem lists all have 98 as the data_version. Config_list does not
work, for input or output.
I understood that config_list wouldn't work. That's why I suggested that
you need first to fix the lists by changing DATA_FILE_VERSION in
Mark Sapiro wrote:
I understood that config_list wouldn't work. That's why I suggested that you
need first to fix the lists by changing DATA_FILE_VERSION in Mailman/Version.py
and then instantiating the lists to fix them.
I guess I am not understanding what you mean by instantiating
On 08/16/2014 08:04 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
I guess I am not understanding what you mean by instantiating existing
lists. All the others have version 104, as does the Version.py file.
Anything you do which accesses a list's config.pck via
Mailman/MailList.py (which is pretty much any
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Anything you do which accesses a list's config.pck via Mailman/MailList.py
(which is pretty much any Mailman process other than bin/dumpdb) will test if
Mailman.Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION is greater than the list's data_version and
if so, will run
14 matches
Mail list logo
