On 4/10/19 12:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> The path forward is to increase the community of MM 3 users which will
> result in more people contributing to the project and faster progress.
On that note, I migrated my half-dozen lists (a few hundred recipients
in total) to MM3 yesterday. I'm
On 4/10/19 12:10 PM, Jeff Hunter wrote:
> I have a mailman list that is working correctly, except for some of the links
> on the base admin web page and it's child pages. The list is at
> listserv.mydomain.com and all of the links on the list admin page start with
> that base url, except the
I have a mailman list that is working correctly, except for some of the links
on the base admin web page and it's child pages. The list is at
listserv.mydomain.com and all of the links on the list admin page start with
that base url, except the link "Go to list archives". That link drops the
On 4/10/19 2:53 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> What Mailman things need assistance in MM3? I've avoided jumping in because
> honestly every time I looked it seemed like all the focus was everything but
> the email reflector bits.
There are (at the moment) 509 open issues at
On 4/10/19 12:08 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> Maybe there's a place for a community-driven port of MM2 onto python3. I
> am not volunteering, too many other projects currently.
I think a much more productive use of the community's resources would be
implementation of a light weight, non-Django
On 4/10/19 12:08 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> The main thing is that from appearances MM3 is large enterprise-grade
> list manager, but many of us don't need that, we need something for a
> few (<100?) lists with a few (<500?) members. I can run that on a small
> BSD box; spinning up django, sass,
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 09:25 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> The path forward is to increase the community of MM 3 users which will
> result in more people contributing to the project and faster progress.
What Mailman things need assistance in MM3? I've avoided jumping in because
honestly every
On 4/10/19 2:08 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> Or rust, or python3 (which might be the easiest). I'm not sufficiently
> up on the python differences, but. it can't be -that- difficult.
> (and aren't there tools to assist? some code claims to be both v2 and v3
> compatible) (gnat? that's really
I'm more worried another DMARC style debacle myself, more than a Python
security issue, although that could be an issue.
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:29 PM Sean McBride
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:59 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users said:
>
> >On 4/10/19 12:49 PM, Sean
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:36:24AM -0400, Matthew Goebel wrote:
> Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are people
> going to move off of mailman 2?
Most of my mailman lists are run off a CentOS 6 box, have done for a long time,
quite stable.
CentOS 8 will (is
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:36:59 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users said:
>On 4/10/19 12:49 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:38:34 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users said:
>>
>>> How much support for python 2 have you been getting until now, and why
>>> do you believe you
On 4/10/2019 11:36 AM, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users wrote:
With a properly sandboxed application your security vulnerability has to
be a) exploitable through that application and b) able to break out of
the sandbox and wreak havoc to your host system.
Exactly.
(That said, given the
On 4/10/19 12:49 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:38:34 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users said:
>
>> How much support for python 2 have you been getting until now, and why
>> do you believe you will need it in the future?
>
> Fixes to security vulnerabilities basically.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:38:34 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users said:
>> Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are
>> people going to move off of mailman 2?
>
>How much support for python 2 have you been getting until now, and why
>do you believe you will need it
On 4/10/19 10:36 AM, Matthew Goebel wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are
> people going to move off of mailman 2?
How much support for python 2 have you been getting until now, and why
do you believe you will need it in the future?
--
Dimitri
On 4/10/19 9:32 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Mark Sapiro writes:
>
> > You may want to add
> >
> > PIPFile=/home/mailman/data/master-qrunner.pid
>
> should that variable be PIDFile?
Absolutely yes. Thanks Steve.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay
On Apr 10, 2019, at 11:44 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> You may want to add
>
> PIPFile=/home/mailman/data/master-qrunner.pid
Ok, thanks, will do.
>
> However, I don't think that's relevant to your issue. I don't know why
> the rm command doesn't work. How do you know it doesn't?
I touched a
Mark Sapiro writes:
> You may want to add
>
> PIPFile=/home/mailman/data/master-qrunner.pid
should that variable be PIDFile?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
On 4/10/19 8:46 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> I'll probably continue with MM2 until either it's ported
> to python3 or I stop running these lists.
The GNU Mailman project will never port Mailman 2.1 to Python 3.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area,
On 4/10/19 8:36 AM, Matthew Goebel wrote:
>
> Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are
> people going to move
> off of mailman 2? I've been looking at mailman 3 and finding it hard to
> grok after using
> mailman 2 for many years. I haven't seen a discussion about
On 4/10/2019 8:36 AM, Matthew Goebel wrote:
Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are
people going to move
off of mailman 2? I've been looking at mailman 3 and finding it hard to
grok after using
mailman 2 for many years. I haven't seen a discussion about this so
On 4/10/19 8:06 AM, Bryan Blackwell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm learning how to use systemd on my Fedora box, since I still had MM as a
> script startup I thought I'd fix that. Below is a unit file, it starts and
> stops ok but the rm command doesn't work. Comments welcome.
>
> [Unit]
>
Hey,
Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are
people going to move
off of mailman 2? I've been looking at mailman 3 and finding it hard to
grok after using
mailman 2 for many years. I haven't seen a discussion about this so I
thought I would
check and see if people
Hi folks,
I'm learning how to use systemd on my Fedora box, since I still had MM as a
script startup I thought I'd fix that. Below is a unit file, it starts and
stops ok but the rm command doesn't work. Comments welcome.
[Unit]
Description=Mailman, the GNU Mailing List Manager
24 matches
Mail list logo
