Re: [Mailman-Users] Digests sent out with wrong timestamp

Torsten: Which MTA are you using? It handles the situation of no Date: header is being added by a mail client VERY badly. Jeff G. Torsten Ehlers wrote: Hi, I'm using Mailman 2.1.5 on a Debian Woody installation. When I tell Mailman to receive my mails from a list in a daily digest I receive

Re: [Mailman-Users] Digests sent out with wrong timestamp

Brad: It seems to be worse than not having the date set. The MTA itself is behaving very badly by setting the sent date to 0 seconds since the January 1, 1970 (standard zero time in UNIX). The chances that ALL messages are dated January 1, 1970 because of a time synchronization problem are

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLYMODERATED list.

Mark Sapiro wrote: Brad Knowles wrote: At 1:49 AM -0500 2005-02-04, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I checked the vette log. The message isn't even in there. Some of the auto-replies to it are (i.e. message rejected, it's a virus). And the message shows in the pipermail archives. In that

Re: [Mailman-Users] Another newbie startup question

Almost sounds like the file system that contains his /var/spool/mail is full or nearly full. Brad Knowles wrote: At 3:12 PM -0600 2005-02-04, C. Jon Hinkle wrote: Now, the next set of problems. I added a list of 230 names/e-dresses to the list using the mass subscribe box. It seems to have

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Milter subsystem telling sendmail todiscard Mailman digests

Brad Knowles wrote: At 10:36 PM -0500 2005-02-01, Jeff Groves wrote: Having never coded in Python before and never submitted a diff before, please bear with me if I overkilled something! It's easier to apply something like this as a patch if the information is supplied as a context diff

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail Milter subsystem telling sendmail to discard Mailman digests

I've been banging my head against my monitor for a week now trying to figure out why this is happening, but I cannot. I have this setup: Fedora Core 2 Mailman 2.1.5 Sendmail 8.13.1 mimedefang 2.49 spamassassin 3.0.2 milter-date 0.12.160 Here's what's going on: Email to the list comes in.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Milter subsystem telling sendmail to discard Mailman digests

or not and if so, what format it is using so that I can report the problem to the milter-date developer. Again, sorry for answering my own posting again, Jeff G. Jeff Groves wrote: I've been banging my head against my monitor for a week now trying to figure out why this is happening, but I cannot

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Milter subsystem telling sendmail todiscard Mailman digests

So, I'm going to have to learn python and figure out where it's not putting the Date: header and make it do it myself. Fair enough. Jeff G. Mark Sapiro wrote: Jeff Groves wrote: Well, again, I have found the answer to my own post. I'm sorry everyone. snip As you can see, 4 lines from the end

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Milter subsystem telling sendmail todiscard Mailman digests

issue. Jeff G. Tokio Kikuchi wrote: Jeff Groves wrote: So, I'm going to have to learn python and figure out where it's not putting the Date: header and make it do it myself. Hi, I think I can fix this in Handlers/ToDigest.py The digests don't go through Message.py which was fixed in 2.1 beta 1

[Mailman-Users] filter_mime_types example

I am trying to come up with a good starter filter_mime_types list. I went through my /etc/mime.types and picked-out all of the top level identifiers that I knew for sure that I didn't want... At least I think I'm sure... Anyway, here's my list: image application audio model video Have I made

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 VERP / Sendmail

Mark Sapiro wrote: I'm not a sendmail config expert, but I've used sendmail installations where addresses of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] get delivered in exactly the same way as [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think it works that way by default, See for example

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.

Maybe you should install a virus scanning feature to your mailer? I use mimedefang which has a hook to many different virus scanning products. I use f-prot. My platform: Fedora Core 2 Sendmail 8.13.1 mimedefang 2.48 f-prot linux ws 4.4.2 this configuration discards infected email messages.

[Mailman-Users] Are the regexps used in Mailman really Regular Expressions?

Are the regexp used in Mailman similar to those used in awk? If so, why don't you have to escape characters like . in an email address? Is there anywhere that has a HowTo on the regexps standard used in Mailman? Thanks, Jeff G. -- Law of Procrastination: Procrastination avoids boredom; one

Re: [Mailman-Users] Are the regexps used in Mailman really RegularExpressions?

sensitive. So, if I enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the address of the list and I only have [EMAIL PROTECTED], then Mailman throws a no implicit address error. Can anyone refute or confirm this hypothesis? Jeff G. Mark Sapiro wrote: Jeff Groves wrote: Are the regexp used in Mailman similar to those used

Re: [Mailman-Users] Are the regexps used in Mailman really RegularExpressions?

So, would that never match scenario be a feature or a bug? My opinion is that Mailman should do the Python equivalent of a tolower to every email address (and every regular expression) before applying the regular expressions filter Jeff G. Mark Sapiro wrote: Jeff Groves wrote: I'm still